• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "No contract but......"

Collapse

  • Mordac
    replied
    Also if you have had you contract checked and passed, they can't do you for interest & penalties, only the actual tax on the deemed salary. *******.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by Fleetwood
    Yes, but if your work practices don't reflect the contract, then they can use that in their favour, but you can't. Is that it? If so, it's hardly "fair".

    Yep, thats about it. At the investigation stage they arn't looking for a fair solution, they are looking for a reason to start legal action. No it's not fair and you end up arguing the case in court. You'd probably still win but do you really need the aggravation of a court case when you can get your contract checked quickly easily and relatively cheaply?

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB
    They only go after your working practices if they can't get you on the contract. If the contract is duff they will use that as evidence that you are caught by IR35 since that is what you are contractually obliged to do.
    Yes, but if your work practices don't reflect the contract, then they can use that in their favour, but you can't. Is that it? If so, it's hardly "fair".

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by Fleetwood
    ...is why everyone has their contracts run through with a fine-tooth comb by specialist lawyers to see if they're IR35 friendly, whereas the IR will totally ignore the contract and look at the contactor's true working practices at the customer site during an IR35 investigation?

    Confused of Brussels

    They only go after your working practices if they can't get you on the contract. If the contract is duff they will use that as evidence that you are caught by IR35 since that is what you are contractually obliged to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    Ce que je ne comprends pas....

    ...is why everyone has their contracts run through with a fine-tooth comb by specialist lawyers to see if they're IR35 friendly, whereas the IR will totally ignore the contract and look at the contactor's true working practices at the customer site during an IR35 investigation?

    Confused of Brussels

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Also, and an afterthought on this.

    On Thursday I was told that they were going to make the initial changes and send me a contract. Nothing turned up. They made the changes this afternoon and were obviously going to wait until I'd started before sending me the contract, without the changes I had requested.

    Now as it stands I have no wiggle room to get this checked for IR35. I am expected to start tomorrow and have only an electronic copy of the contract.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    I spoke to them this morning as the new contract had not arrived. I was told that an ammended one would be sent in nthe afternoon. This afternoon I spoke to somebody there who told me that they couldn't take out the 'repayment clause' as the client had insisted on it. I told them that I would not sign and definately would not be starting work. Now I have just got another contract and spotted this term.

    'be subject to the legitimate instructions and monitoring of the client or end user and the direction, supervision and control of the client or end user and abide by the the rules and regulations of the client or end user and any proposal requirements relating to independent contractors'

    Not keen of the control and direction aspects of this clause!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish
    They are supposed to be sending me an electronic copy this afternoon. Won't be able to get it vetted before tomorrow though.
    You can try emailing it to Bauer & Cottrell, when I used them recently they were very quick (and thorough). They also spoke to the agency and by the end of the day I had a new pdf contract via email, and a paper one in the post. You need to pay by credit/debit card for this though.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    They are supposed to be sending me an electronic copy this afternoon. Won't be able to get it vetted before tomorrow though.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    London died this morning for me. Client withdrew the role.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    I have done in the past Tony, but in your circumstances, I would use it as a delaying tactic until you know one way or the other about London (assuming that London is still live and likely).

    I don't know whether or not you trust this agent, but it sounds like they are deliberately delaying the contract until after you have started because they have no intention of changing it, and they judge that you'll accept it in order to get paid for work already done.

    You could always say that your accountant won't let you start!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Joe Black.
    I've been contracting for almost 8 years and frequently sign contracts after I have started.
    As have I, but I would at the very least want to see an electronic copy. Mainly for IR35 checking reasons, but also to confirm basic things like the rate and which expenses are covered and which aren't etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish
    ....I am expected to start tomorrow. Would you? Does starting imply that you accept the terms and conditions of an unseen contract?
    Do remember that your insurances are probably not valid in such a circumstance. i.e. driving to and from the client, work you do at the client and working at the client.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    I have started gigs without the paperwork (which has always come through eventually), and have had no problems, but others on here in the same situation have had issues.

    hth (but it probably doesn't)

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Black.
    replied
    Originally posted by TonyEnglish
    ....I am expected to start tomorrow. Would you? Does starting imply that you accept the terms and conditions of an unseen contract?
    It may imply that, but there is nothing legally binding you to that contract until you sign it. So if it turns up and there is something contractually you disagree with then you can dispute it. I've been contracting for almost 8 years and frequently sign contracts after I have started.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X