Mark Bridger - guilty or not? - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

oscarose replied

3 October 2012, 10:49
Hang 'em high, flock 'em first.

A society where a child is not safe is no society.
Leave a comment:
tractor replied

3 October 2012, 10:26
...

Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

Sorry if I (or anyone else on this thread) have offended anyone. But none of the comments have been directed at his crime. It is all about the scummy media. Remember that Bristol case where the media vilified that guy as he was a bit weird? I don't want to see it repeated. Bridger might be innocent and the real criminal at large.

EDIT: And I am more the happy if the mods want to delete the thread.

Yeah I remember the Bristol thing well. I noticed the sarcastic emote at the end of your post but it did seem a bit 'fire it up and duck' and the temptation is to trivialise the plight of this poor child and her family as an acceptable 'casualty of war' in order to have a 'justified' go at the media. I just didn't think it was acceptable to trivialise the situation.

When they catch the moron that abducted this innocent little girl, I will be first to join the crucifixion thread, believe me!

I just hope she is found ok.
Leave a comment:
BrilloPad replied

3 October 2012, 10:21
Sorry if I (or anyone else on this thread) have offended anyone. But none of the comments have been directed at his crime. It is all about the scummy media. Remember that Bristol case where the media vilified that guy as he was a bit weird? I don't want to see it repeated. Bridger might be innocent and the real criminal at large.

EDIT: And I am more the happy if the mods want to delete the thread.
Leave a comment:
tractor replied

3 October 2012, 09:56
...

Originally posted by sasguru View Post

Nothing we do or say on this thread will harm, hinder or help the girl and her family.

I didn't say it would. Respect was the word I mentioned.
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

3 October 2012, 09:51
Nothing we do or say on this thread will harm, hinder or help the girl and her family.
Leave a comment:
tractor replied

3 October 2012, 09:42
...

TBH this scummy thread needs to be closed.

Brillopad you should know better. I'd consider unfriending you but then you'd have no-one.

Have a bit of respect for a defenceless, frightened child who may not even be alive, not to even mention her family
Leave a comment:
geoffreywhereveryoumaybe replied

3 October 2012, 09:41
From the Telegraph

Don't buy it - read online.

"He is known to have had a number of relationships in the district and fathered six children...One resident of the estate said that he was recently evicted from his rented accommodation after his landlady discovered that he had been keeping chickens inside the property. "

Well anyone who keeps chickens cooped up in a house must be guilty.
Leave a comment:
SimonMac replied

3 October 2012, 09:39
Leave a comment:
PorkPie replied

3 October 2012, 09:38
Hope you're all having fun.

You do realise a little girl has gone missing, and is probably either scared witless, abused or worse right?
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

3 October 2012, 09:35
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post

And he drives a van! QED

People with vans are invariably dodgy. Don't you have one ? ...
Leave a comment:
xoggoth replied

3 October 2012, 09:18
And he drives a van! QED
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

3 October 2012, 09:07
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

That sounds like 2 guilty votes to me. And 0 non-guilty. By the CUK process of extrapolation I reckon he is guilty as charged!

Now what was he accused of again?

I think he's not guilty coz he's called Mark. Marks are generally Ok.
Oh hehis surname is Bridger, you say? Guilty as sin, then.
Leave a comment:
BrilloPad replied

3 October 2012, 09:04
Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post

If he has taken the girl, why? His daughter was playing with the missing girl? He'd have to be incredibly stupid.

Oh, ex-soldier you said.

Originally posted by Old Hack View Post

Lots of ex-squaddies are odd, as proven by a couple on here. Sometimes, they find it hard to adjust to actually not being told what to do all day. Can send them over the edge.

That sounds like 2 guilty votes to me. And 0 non-guilty. By the CUK process of extrapolation I reckon he is guilty as charged!

Now what was he accused of again?
Leave a comment:
Old Hack replied

3 October 2012, 09:02
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

Do you think he is guilty or not? Are his eyes too close together? Former soldier - dodgy or what?

No need to read any facts - uniformed speculation is great.

Lots of ex-squaddies are odd, as proven by a couple on here. Sometimes, they find it hard to adjust to actually not being told what to do all day. Can send them over the edge.
Leave a comment:
MarillionFan replied

3 October 2012, 09:01
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

Do you think he is guilty or not? Are his eyes too close together? Former soldier - dodgy or what?

No need to read any facts - uniformed speculation is great.

If he has taken the girl, why? His daughter was playing with the missing girl? He'd have to be incredibly stupid.

Oh, ex-soldier you said.
Leave a comment: