The study called for reform of the tax and benefits system to move people from illegal jobs into legitimate work.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Poverty
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Poverty"
Collapse
-
I agree totally with that. My suggested reform. Abolish tax. Abolish benefits. Huge boost to incentives from top to bottom of the economic scale. Since there is no tax to evade or benefits to falsely claim, all jobs that are not illegal are automatically legitimate.
-
The study called for there to be more support, training and development for people who wanted to move from cash-in-hand to formal work.
Why would they want to move to formal work when they can get cash in hand jobs and avoid the contribution to Brownstuff??
Leave a comment:
-
Oh come off it! Nobody is even remotely as rich as Threaded.Originally posted by wc2Water under the bridge now as I'm nearly as rich as Threaded, But when I first left home I had to take a job for less than £50K - This as you can imagine was really hard work (But I always managed to find money for cigars & champers)
I hear Gates has withrawn from public life because he was so embarrassed at coming second to Threaded in the Rich Cvnts of the World index.
Leave a comment:
-
“I wonder if I could get away with using that excuse in court?... I personally only earn £10k p.a. and have 3 kids to support”
I WATCHED ONE Court case that was prosecuting a claimant for not declaring earnings of £11 per week (casual). Yet I wonder how many members of the jury where honest in claiming their Court expenses? Not only that I have never known a barrister not to fiddle his travel claim or to exaggerate his hours. But that is not called fiddling in the legal word as it comes under “Costs Assessment” when someone objects to the fiddling. A few weeks not declaring £11 results in hundreds if not thousands of pounds being fiddled in expenses in the case.
Leave a comment:
-
I can't even begin to imagine how you survived!Originally posted by wc2Water under the bridge now as I'm nearly as rich as Threaded, But when I first left home I had to take a job for less than £50K - This as you can imagine was really hard work (But I always managed to find money for cigars & champers)
Leave a comment:
-
Water under the bridge now as I'm nearly as rich as Threaded, But when I first left home I had to take a job for less than £50K - This as you can imagine was really hard work (But I always managed to find money for cigars & champers)Originally posted by FleetwoodNone of these "poor" people, drink, smoke, have mobile phones or satellite television, do they?
Leave a comment:
-
Is that really what a young troll is refered to as?Originally posted by TrollI personally only earn £10k p.a. and have 3 kids to support
Leave a comment:
-
None of these "poor" people, drink, smoke, have mobile phones or satellite television, do they?
Leave a comment:
-
It found that people working and claiming benefits did so out of "need not greed".
I wonder if I could get away with using that excuse in court?... I personally only earn £10k p.a. and have 3 kids to support
Leave a comment:
-
Poverty
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5084648.stm
People who work and claim benefits do so often because they are in dire financial trouble, a Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) study has said.
Many claimants took illegal cash-in-hand jobs to pay for food and heating or to make debt repayments.
The study's author said they were "hard-working, ordinary people trying to survive day by day".
The study called for reform of the tax and benefits system to move people from illegal jobs into legitimate work.
The JRF study was based on six years of work by the East London Community Links project.
The Community Links project offers those in deprived areas education, childcare provision as well as help and advice.
It found that people working and claiming benefits did so out of "need not greed".
Spokesman Aaron Barbour said: "If you're poor and living in a deprived area, informal work is actually helping people out of absolute abject poverty, helping them survive.
"It's providing for the basics like food and heating."
Despite the introduction of tax credits, designed to supplement the incomes of the low-paid, many people in the study said they felt the system trapped them in a poverty cycle.
In short, the tax and benefits system provided these people with few financial incentives to give up benefits and declare paid work.
More understanding
People with health and childcare issues were particularly prone to working in what is often called the "informal economy".
"They are hard-working, ordinary people trying to survive day by day," Aaron Barbour, study author and Community Links' policy development manager, said.
"The government needs to understand and include the informal economy in all its strategies if it is to reach its employment, anti-poverty and regeneration targets," he added.
The study called for there to be more support, training and development for people who wanted to move from cash-in-hand to formal work.
It added that there also needed to be tax and benefit reform, based on an understanding of why people worked cash-in-hand.
In addition, employers needed to allow more flexible working for those with health and childcare issues.
As for government measures to combat benefit fraud, the study concluded they had "limited success where poverty drives the decision to work informally".
Simple solution (as has been said here a thousand times).
1. Flat rate tax system
2. Remove most of the benefits system
3. Scrap the pathetic, idiotic tax credits system.
4. Give everyone a large tax free allowance (I would say £10K min)
Result is less dependence on the state and more people working.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Today 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50

Leave a comment: