I would respond 'subject to contract', as I would a verbal offer.
If the contract wasn't up to snuff....
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Warning for a mucky new Agents' habit
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Warning for a mucky new Agents' habit"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThis might be common in the UK, might not be, but I'll warn you for it;
Right now some agents in NL demand you sign an 'exclusivity contract';
Just do this: do a whois of the agents' domain. I'm pretty sure their headquarter is in London.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostI have had an agency (K2) ask me to agree before being put forward that I would be available for a contract and would accept it if it were offered. I have always refused to agree to this, mainly on the grounds that the client and I have not interviewed each other yet and it's always possible that one of us might like the other, while the other didn't - the client wouldn't agree in advance to offer the contract if I wanted it, so why should I agree in advance to accept it?
I'd take the same view of this trick: a one-way commitment is not something I'm in business to make.
this is a crazy extreme version, I'd never sign anything that said that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostYeh, I've had that too. Piss take or what?
I've found out more; yes, it's legal, nothing in the law (in NL) to prevent this, unfortunately. But I also know now that it is a condition that's been put on the agent by his client, a government agency that supplies temporary personnel to other government agencies.
You can see how many people respond to the ads on freelance.nl, and it strikes me that there's been only one response to this one; I won't respond as I have an interview tomorrow so would possibly have to pull out of the procedure.
I noticed during the last recession (or the one before it, we seem to have them every year now) that many (primarily government) clientcos start dreaming up very dirty tricks when the market's poor; last time the tax office started demanding people worked for 2 weeks at zero-rate (yes, free!). That collapsed when they tried to do a Dutch version of IR35 on one of their own contractors, who told them thhat if they went ahead and defined him as an employee he'd press charges for making him work below minimum wage; a criminal offense over here! So that trick was quickly ended. But yep, it's the mucky-money-grabbing bastard season again where desperate agents and clientcos will grab money from anywhere to keep financing their bloated management pyramids and oversized unnecessary office buildings.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostI have had an agency (K2) ask me to agree before being put forward that I would be available for a contract and would accept it if it were offered. I have always refused to agree to this, mainly on the grounds that the client and I have not interviewed each other yet and it's always possible that one of us might like the other, while the other didn't - the client wouldn't agree in advance to offer the contract if I wanted it, so why should I agree in advance to accept it?
I'd take the same view of this trick: a one-way commitment is not something I'm in business to make.
Leave a comment:
-
Just tell the agent that you'll guarentee to accept the contract, but also that you'll "guarentee" to give them notice one day later. The client won't like that, so it is unlikely the agency will hold you to it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostSurely you should your own addendum that unless they procure you the contract and you turn down any other offers then you should be compensated. See how they like that...
Leave a comment:
-
Surely you should your own addendum that unless they procure you the contract and you turn down any other offers then you should be compensated. See how they like that...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostI have had an agency (K2) ask me to agree before being put forward that I would be available for a contract and would accept it if it were offered. I have always refused to agree to this, mainly on the grounds that the client and I have not interviewed each other yet and it's always possible that one of us might like the other, while the other didn't - the client wouldn't agree in advance to offer the contract if I wanted it, so why should I agree in advance to accept it?
I'd take the same view of this trick: a one-way commitment is not something I'm in business to make.
Leave a comment:
-
I have had an agency (K2) ask me to agree before being put forward that I would be available for a contract and would accept it if it were offered. I have always refused to agree to this, mainly on the grounds that the client and I have not interviewed each other yet and it's always possible that one of us might like the other, while the other didn't - the client wouldn't agree in advance to offer the contract if I wanted it, so why should I agree in advance to accept it?
I'd take the same view of this trick: a one-way commitment is not something I'm in business to make.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI do love this site. One gets so many good ideas
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doomage View PostAlso, when in the Netherlands be careful what you post on facebook Dutch teenager convicted of Facebook murder
I wonder what the general forum in forums.contractornl.com are like?
Leave a comment:
-
Also, when in the Netherlands be careful what you post on facebook Dutch teenager convicted of Facebook murder
I wonder what the general forum in forums.contractornl.com are like?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: