• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Monday Links from the Sickbed vol. CXXXVII"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    Microsoft is particularly bad though, in that its "normal" x 100.

    The whole 1-5 bucket rubbish would kill anyones Enthusiasm, its just a matter of time.

    This is the killer for most ex - I think this lass is the same . Knowing that in a team of 5, 1 of you has to be rated 1 (best) , 1 has to be rated 2 (second), 1 rated 3 (safe) , 1 rated 4 (time to leave, you're going in 5 next year) , 1 rated 5 (no raise and leave now huh?)

    There are people in every team who are just completely useless, but they are there because the rest of the team tolerates them as they know they are filling that 5 spot next year... This is very silly, but totally understandable.
    Good point - It seems actually a perverse incentive for teams to hold on to duffers as long as possible as useful cover or "cannon fodder" for the rest.

    Conversely, the more competent someone is the more of a threat they must be to others so the more chance they'll be hampered and stitched up or even hounded out.

    So the management are presumably perpetually shuffling teams around, to try and prevent these inevitable outcomes from developing.

    No wonder the muppets take years and years to produce softare of even adequate quality.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Get well soon NF
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Get well soon.
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Anyway, get well soon Nick. Hope it's only a summer cold and not the ticker again.
    Thanks all. I popped down to London at the weekend (nothing to do with the Olympics) and reckon I've picked up some bug off all those people on the Tube

    Worst I've ever felt (much worse than the heart attack, which was only ever discomfort) and the first time I've missed a day's invoicing due to illness

    I'm still running a temperature and have a stinking headache, but no longer shivering uncontrollably and sweating buckets, so hopefully I can get back to the magic money fountain ClientCo tomorrow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    None of the things she mentions are unique to Microsoft; I've experienced most of them at a variety of companies although luckily as a contractor I can avoid a lot of it. (
    Microsoft is particularly bad though, in that its "normal" x 100.

    The whole 1-5 bucket rubbish would kill anyones Enthusiasm, its just a matter of time.

    This is the killer for most ex - I think this lass is the same . Knowing that in a team of 5, 1 of you has to be rated 1 (best) , 1 has to be rated 2 (second), 1 rated 3 (safe) , 1 rated 4 (time to leave, you're going in 5 next year) , 1 rated 5 (no raise and leave now huh?)

    There are people in every team who are just completely useless, but they are there because the rest of the team tolerates them as they know they are filling that 5 spot next year... This is very silly, but totally understandable.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post

    The Unavoidable Golden Ratio

    I think that link is OK, but I'm currently unable to check on account of to my IP address being temporarily banned from the site by their "rampaging robot" detector (for downloading too many papers in a short time, presumably) ..
    Hmm ...

    Code:
    Access has been unblocked but please note that our automatic robot 
    detection system will replace the block if an "attack" is detected. This 
    can also be triggered by "accelerator" (pre-fetching) software.  You 
    must remove, disable, or correctly configure such software before 
    accessing our site. Why?  See:
    
    	http://arxiv.org/RobotsBeware.html
    
    These types of blocks may be the result of opening many pages rapidly 
    within arXiv, such as with a news reader or other RSS aggregater which 
    attempts to connect to the site.  This block may also have been the 
    result of the "Allow speculative downloading in the background" option 
    within Adobe Acrobat Reader.  Please be certain this option is disabled 
    (Preferences --> Internet) before accessing this site again.
    
    --
    arXiv admin

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Interesting. Having tried to watch Terry and June recently the guy just came out as a loser, and I think that applied to various other comedies of the time. The author is right on the button there by saying our expectations have changed.

    On his choices of Classics I have to disagree on Only Fools and Horses. It has been repeated so many times I got sick of it. Fawlty Towers suffers here as well.

    I'd put The Good Life way ahead of George and Mildred. To be honest I always found them cringeworthy.
    I think a lot of the datedness boils down to people being less deferential to authority figures and conformity, of one sort or another, and thus not finding it so funny when this is poked fun at (usually in a very gentle way).

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Interesting. Having tried to watch Terry and June recently the guy just came out as a loser, and I think that applied to various other comedies of the time. The author is right on the button there by saying our expectations have changed.

    On his choices of Classics I have to disagree on Only Fools and Horses. It has been repeated so many times I got sick of it. Fawlty Towers suffers here as well.

    I'd put The Good Life way ahead of George and Mildred. To be honest I always found them cringeworthy.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    [*]Golden Ratio in logo designs - "Beauty and aesthetics have been praised from time immemorial. But little did people know that the most effective, perfectly balanced, and visually compelling creations followed the tid-bits of mathematics. At least not until 1860, when German physicist and psychologist Gustav Theodor Fechner proposed that a simple ratio, an irrational number defines the balance in nature." Saikat Banerjee takes a look at the ratio as it appears behind the scenes of some famous logos. ..
    Another paper on the Golden Ratio was published only today on the ArXiv, although I haven't looked at it yet:

    The Unavoidable Golden Ratio

    I think that link is OK, but I'm currently unable to check on account of to my IP address being temporarily banned from the site by their "rampaging robot" detector (for downloading too many papers in a short time, presumably)

    Anyway, get well soon Nick. Hope it's only a summer cold and not the ticker again.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    If there's a bug going round, the music has stopped and it's sat on me Just going to post these and then see about an early night:
    • The Making Of: Jet Set Willy - Matthew Smith, the creator of the classic Spectrum game, explains how it came to be, in great detail: "We wonder how pirouetting rabbits, wobbling jellies and the entire cast of inanimate objects brought disturbingly to life fitted into Smith’s everyday existence. 'That may have been the mushrooms,' he offers, helpfully."
    Happy invoicing!
    Reminds me of when we used the "Tatung Einstein" for cross assembly at Ocean.

    I think that's what got me involved in embedded development...

    Get well soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    So what about me then? Exception to the rule?
    You're just "different".

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Well known fact that pedantry leads to catching more common colds and bad health.
    So what about me then? Exception to the rule?

    Leave a comment:


  • ctdctd
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Bonus linky while it's still topical: Mo Farah Running Away From Things


    You have way too much time on your hands

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Get well soon NF

    Also try more exercise, vitamin c and echinacea...
    Well known fact that pedantry leads to catching more common colds and bad health.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Bonus linky while it's still topical: Mo Farah Running Away From Things

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Can I have your slippers

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Get well soon NF

    Also try more exercise, vitamin c and echinacea...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X