Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Petition to stop government snooping"
Labour brought in anti terror stop and search powers as soon as they could, the IRA had been in cease fire for years and 9/11 was not expected but they felt the need to push through section 44. Arses.
If anyone is interested, there's an e-petition here against the proposed new Internet and phone monitoring powers.
I don't have much of a problem with GCHQ having these powers; but I do have a major problem with the same being granted to local councils and the like, for no doubt trivial money grubbing reasons unrelated to crime. Chances are the main incentive is to make it easier for councils to spot sub-letting, and to charge extra rent or a council tax supplement.
I don't have much of a problem with GCHQ having these powers; but I do have a major problem with the same being granted to local councils and the like, for no doubt trivial money grubbing reasons unrelated to crime.
If you have ever had relatives working for the council you realise what a set of gossips and interfering busybodies they can be.
My own parents both worked for the local council and were so concerned about their salaries being blasted around the Town Hall gossip circuit that they refused to declare their incomes on my uni grant application form, with the result that I only got the minimum grant.
Now Mr Diver, about your council tax rebate. You say you've living on your own but according to your Internet usage you've been visiting Www.rentboyhomeservice.com and www.beastilitywithrover.net quite regularly so were rejecting your appeal saying you live alone. Oh and you'll need a dog licence as well.
Now Mr Diver, about your council tax rebate. You say you've living on your own but according to your Internet usage you've been visiting Www.rentboyhomeservice.com and www.beastilitywithrover.net quite regularly so were rejecting your appeal saying you live alone. Oh and you'll need a dog licence as well.
If anyone is interested, there's an e-petition here against the proposed new Internet and phone monitoring powers.
I don't have much of a problem with GCHQ having these powers; but I do have a major problem with the same being granted to local councils and the like, for no doubt trivial money grubbing reasons unrelated to crime. Chances are the main incentive is to make it easier for councils to spot sub-letting, and to charge extra rent or a council tax supplement.
If anyone is interested, there's an e-petition here against the proposed new Internet and phone monitoring powers.
I don't have much of a problem with GCHQ having these powers; but I do have a major problem with the same being granted to local councils and the like, for no doubt trivial money grubbing reasons unrelated to crime. Chances are the main incentive is to make it easier for councils to spot sub-letting, and to charge extra rent or a council tax supplement.
Leave a comment: