• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "At some point in the not too distant future we're going to rue the day!"

Collapse

  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    the last I heard was that we had 5 squadrons with ten planes each. so 86 => 160 is good news , to my ears at least

    where do you get your info from Simonmac ?



    House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 31 Jan 2012 (pt 0002)

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    We have 86 in service from 160 ordered, they have 24 in service from 72 ordered
    the last I heard was that we had 5 squadrons with ten planes each. so 86 => 160 is good news , to my ears at least

    where do you get your info from Simonmac ?



    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    Question from the back:

    How many do we have, sir?
    We have 86 in service from 160 ordered, they have 24 in service from 72 ordered

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    not 72, and nothing for the carriers.
    We do have three squadrons of stealth stunt-kites , so I believe


    You wouldn't want to say that when you're pissed!

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Scoobos View Post
    Question from the back:

    How many do we have, sir?
    not 72, and nothing for the carriers.
    We do have three squadrons of stealth stunt-kites , so I believe


    Leave a comment:


  • Scoobos
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    We have already sold them 72 Eurofighter Typhoon;s I would be more worried about them than a load of BSM learner drivers in the sky
    Question from the back:

    How many do we have, sir?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    [QUOTE=SupremeSpod;1548828]The hawk is a capable little fighter in it's own right. QUOTE]

    No it's not, it's a very good trainer with no radar, slow, non agile (i.e. a stable platform) with very limited weapon carriage.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    About time we flog it off to the yanks for £1 like qinetico.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Hack
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    The US has being doing even bigger deals with the Saudi's, 9/11 is still in their collective memories, but the prospect of no oil is worse to them
    I'd never worry about the Saudi's. I reckon the only way they'd get these planes to actually fight would be to fill them with Pakistani ex-pat workers

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    The hawk is a capable little fighter in it's own right. Seems like 911 has been forgiven.
    The US has being doing even bigger deals with the Saudi's, 9/11 is still in their collective memories, but the prospect of no oil is worse to them

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    We have already sold them 72 Eurofighter Typhoon;s I would be more worried about them than a load of BSM learner drivers in the sky
    The hawk is a capable little fighter in it's own right. Seems like 911 has been forgiven.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    The Saudis are facing an uprising from all those women who think they should not just be servile chattels. Can you believe it!

    How else are they going to get them back in the kitchen?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    and now for something completely different.........................


    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    We have already sold them 72 Eurofighter Typhoon;s I would be more worried about them than a load of BSM learner drivers in the sky

    Leave a comment:


  • At some point in the not too distant future we're going to rue the day!

    BBC News - BAE Systems and Saudi Arabia sign £1.9bn Hawk jet deal

Working...
X