Originally posted by EternalOptimist
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "At some point in the not too distant future we're going to rue the day!"
Collapse
-
the last I heard was that we had 5 squadrons with ten planes each. so 86 => 160 is good news , to my ears at leastOriginally posted by SimonMac View PostWe have 86 in service from 160 ordered, they have 24 in service from 72 ordered
where do you get your info from Simonmac ?
Leave a comment:
-
You wouldn't want to say that when you're pissed!Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postnot 72, and nothing for the carriers.
We do have three squadrons of stealth stunt-kites , so I believe

Leave a comment:
-
not 72, and nothing for the carriers.Originally posted by Scoobos View PostQuestion from the back:
How many do we have, sir?
We do have three squadrons of stealth stunt-kites , so I believe
Leave a comment:
-
[QUOTE=SupremeSpod;1548828]The hawk is a capable little fighter in it's own right. QUOTE]
No it's not, it's a very good trainer with no radar, slow, non agile (i.e. a stable platform) with very limited weapon carriage.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd never worry about the Saudi's. I reckon the only way they'd get these planes to actually fight would be to fill them with Pakistani ex-pat workersOriginally posted by SimonMac View PostThe US has being doing even bigger deals with the Saudi's, 9/11 is still in their collective memories, but the prospect of no oil is worse to them
Leave a comment:
-
The US has being doing even bigger deals with the Saudi's, 9/11 is still in their collective memories, but the prospect of no oil is worse to themOriginally posted by SupremeSpod View PostThe hawk is a capable little fighter in it's own right. Seems like 911 has been forgiven.
Leave a comment:
-
The hawk is a capable little fighter in it's own right. Seems like 911 has been forgiven.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWe have already sold them 72 Eurofighter Typhoon;s I would be more worried about them than a load of BSM learner drivers in the sky
Leave a comment:
-
The Saudis are facing an uprising from all those women who think they should not just be servile chattels. Can you believe it!
How else are they going to get them back in the kitchen?
Leave a comment:
-
and now for something completely different.........................Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
Leave a comment:
-
We have already sold them 72 Eurofighter Typhoon;s I would be more worried about them than a load of BSM learner drivers in the sky
Leave a comment:
-
At some point in the not too distant future we're going to rue the day!
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: