Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Citigroup shareholders reject fat executive pay package"
Collapse
-
why?Originally posted by BigTime View PostDoes that mean he's back on $1 this year?
One of the links was a bit gloomy: 10 Middle-Class Jobs That Will Vanish by 2018 | InvestingAnswers
No.7 - Doomed
until we go automated > 30 years because only new companies in low cost countries buy new plant then most of them will be offshored.
Machinist may fall foul of computer modelling and 3D printing but that is better than most of it being offshored like it is now.Many of them are retirement age
Leave a comment:
-
All three were a burden I can live without.Originally posted by AtW View PostIt sounds like your ex-wife took not only your money but also your manners Sir.
Leave a comment:
-
Good job!!!! But from reading it, it means tulip! They still get it. Right?!Originally posted by AtW View PostAt its annual meeting Tuesday, 55% of the bank's shareholders voted against the pay packages granted to Citigroup's top executives, including CEO Vikram Pandit's $15 million for last year and $10 million retention pay.
Source: Citigroup shareholders reject fat executive pay package
Good news - about time execs in public companies were shown their place - they are just hired workers and shareholders OWN the company.
Leave a comment:
-
I'll do that when you **** off back to Russia.Originally posted by AtW View PostWell, that someone else can sue current owners in court then.
Now go back and clean up the quarterdeck sailor.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Does that mean he's back on $1 this year?
One of the links was a bit gloomy: 10 Middle-Class Jobs That Will Vanish by 2018 | InvestingAnswers
No.7 - Doomed
Leave a comment:
-
All ownership is theft.Originally posted by AtW View PostAt its annual meeting Tuesday, 55% of the bank's shareholders voted against the pay packages granted to Citigroup's top executives, including CEO Vikram Pandit's $15 million for last year and $10 million retention pay.
Source: Citigroup shareholders reject fat executive pay package
Good news - about time execs in public companies were shown their place - they are just hired workers and shareholders OWN the company.
Leave a comment:
-
Citigroup shareholders reject fat executive pay package
At its annual meeting Tuesday, 55% of the bank's shareholders voted against the pay packages granted to Citigroup's top executives, including CEO Vikram Pandit's $15 million for last year and $10 million retention pay.
Source: Citigroup shareholders reject fat executive pay package
Good news - about time execs in public companies were shown their place - they are just hired workers and shareholders OWN the company.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Today 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Yesterday 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41

Leave a comment: