• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Have we done 'stamp duty avoidance' yet?"

Collapse

  • saptastic
    replied
    Originally posted by geoff from contracta IOM View Post
    There is no acceptable process in existence to effectively and legitimately avoid or reduce SDLT, some very ropey ones but you will not find them being endorsed or recomended by any respectable tax lawyer.

    Most of the hype about SDLT avoidance that George loves to go on about comes when the property is sold on having been bought by an offshore company in the first instance. The shares of the company are transferred so there is no change of ownership with land registry and no SDLT to pay.
    The biggest avoidance on record:
    Buy for £20m - and pay no stamp duty: How Candy brothers advised foreign buyers to avoid millions in tax on luxury flats | Mail Online

    Leave a comment:


  • geoff from contracta IOM
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Stamp Duty Avoidance Scheme | Save Stamp Duty

    Over lunch a chap said to the table that he was buying a new property and that an IFA was pushing him to undertake a new 'stamp duty' process. The process is based upon 'Sub Sale Relief' and it seems quite a few of these have sprung up.

    What is the view of the panel?
    There is no acceptable process in existence to effectively and legitimately avoid or reduce SDLT, some very ropey ones but you will not find them being endorsed or recomended by any respectable tax lawyer.

    Most of the hype about SDLT avoidance that George loves to go on about comes when the property is sold on having been bought by an offshore company in the first instance. The shares of the company are transferred so there is no change of ownership with land registry and no SDLT to pay.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Don't forget the Prince of Darkness finding £8m quid for his house, probably down the back of a Russians sofa.

    Or the ships steward having a nice little house despite knocking off his secretary.

    Or El Gordo doing nicely after bankrupting the UK.

    Its not just Tories that are lying theiving scum. It just feels really dirty when Labour screw the electorate by taking directorships and avoiding despite spending 13 years 'fighting for the underdog' and moaning about the duplicitous tax evoiders.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    It's an obvious 'within the rules' piece of deliberate and active avoidance. However, since it's probably only perpetrated by wealthy Tory party donors, don't expect to see anything done about it.

    Whatever happened to paying the vendor £50k for the carpets etc to duck under Stamp Duty thresholds?
    Can one purchase carpets for less than £50k?

    sasguru

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post


    Why won't you write a letter to Bliar asking why he uses complex network of companies to allegedly hide his earnings?

    "They reveal that income channelled through a complex network of firms and partnerships controlled by Blair rose more than 40% last year to more than £12m. Of this, almost £10m was paid for "management services". The money was transferred via a network of firms and financial vehicles."

    Blair Inc's 'baffling' increase in earnings | Politics | The Observer

    What kind of **** pays him so much money anyway?
    3rd world despots.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    since it's probably only perpetrated by wealthy Tory party donors


    Why won't you write a letter to Bliar asking why he uses complex network of companies to allegedly hide his earnings?

    "They reveal that income channelled through a complex network of firms and partnerships controlled by Blair rose more than 40% last year to more than £12m. Of this, almost £10m was paid for "management services". The money was transferred via a network of firms and financial vehicles."

    Blair Inc's 'baffling' increase in earnings | Politics | The Observer

    What kind of **** pays him so much money anyway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alf W
    replied
    It's an obvious 'within the rules' piece of deliberate and active avoidance. However, since it's probably only perpetrated by wealthy Tory party donors, don't expect to see anything done about it.

    Whatever happened to paying the vendor £50k for the carpets etc to duck under Stamp Duty thresholds?

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    started a topic Have we done 'stamp duty avoidance' yet?

    Have we done 'stamp duty avoidance' yet?

    Stamp Duty Avoidance Scheme | Save Stamp Duty

    Over lunch a chap said to the table that he was buying a new property and that an IFA was pushing him to undertake a new 'stamp duty' process. The process is based upon 'Sub Sale Relief' and it seems quite a few of these have sprung up.

    What is the view of the panel?

Working...
X