Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Thanks all for the best wishes. Yes, benched for two years (maybe I'm just crap). I won't know any more about the SGML until the interview. I can do SGML 1986 for transistors, but I'll just have to see what they use.
I'm an engineer by the way, not an IT boffin like you lot.
It's military stuff, so shtumm for now :-)
Praps Zeity would know, he sniffs solder smoke for a living
Thanks all for the best wishes. Yes, benched for two years (maybe I'm just crap). I won't know any more about the SGML until the interview. I can do SGML 1986 for transistors, but I'll just have to see what they use.
I'm an engineer by the way, not an IT boffin like you lot.
You tart I meant give me some more info on the SGML bit to help flesh it out and get to what they want
Good luck with the gig
Thanks all for the best wishes. Yes, benched for two years (maybe I'm just crap). I won't know any more about the SGML until the interview. I can do SGML 1986 for transistors, but I'll just have to see what they use.
I'm an engineer by the way, not an IT boffin like you lot.
1. it's just the old way of 'future proofing' manuals. You just enter the content in plain unformatted text, and then put codes in. It's just the 'steam' version of 'styles' in Word. I'm an old codger and I can still speak DOS so maybe I have a chance :-)
1. it's just the old way of 'future proofing' manuals. You just enter the content in plain unformatted text, and then put codes in. It's just the 'steam' version of 'styles' in Word. I'm an old codger and I can still speak DOS so maybe I have a chance :-)
2. You know the rules, not a sausage until I get the gig. After two years on the rock, it's all me-me-me until then.
I thought this was a meta language and as such you used it to define declarative languages?
Bizarre, can you give us some more info on the gig?
1. it's just the old way of 'future proofing' manuals. You just enter the content in plain unformatted text, and then put codes in. It's just the 'steam' version of 'styles' in Word. I'm an old codger and I can still speak DOS so maybe I have a chance :-)
2. You know the rules, not a sausage until I get the gig. After two years on the rock, it's all me-me-me until then.
Leave a comment: