• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Time team to become worth watching?"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Look forward to more dumbing down. ...
    How can a program like Time Team be dumbed down anyway?

    Not saying it's dumb already, far from it. But as an avid fan for years, I've never seen anything that could be described as baffling or counter-intuitive or even the slightest bit challenging. It's all clearly explained common sense.

    Also, you could never even describe it as slow - They keep up a cracking pace, and usually have all kinds of secondary related activities on the go like building a celtic mud hut or forging a sword etc.

    I mean what extra bit of dumbness, or dumber quality, could they somehow impart, short of deliberately burying bits of broken pots and odds and ends and challenging the archaeologists to find the real thing among them (and even that has been done, when the team excavated a site that turned out to be a Victorian fake!)

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Well, now she's quit too.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    About time he visited the barbers:



    How come it's wrong for a woman with an MSc in archaeology to present and yet is okay to have Baldrick as apprentice dogsbody? Maybe she needs a cunning plan.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Awful, no pictures of Mary-Ann Ochota at all.

    Here's a pic to make up for the lack of a proper Daily Mail citation and the absence of rectification by the OP



    [She's the one to the right of the miserable old fart]

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Terrible news - If Phil Harding goes too, that'll be pretty much the end for Time Team

    Why can't these effing producers leave things alone?
    WOHS

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    It was find a bimbo from the looks of it.

    An email to archaeologists last year from Wildfire Television, which makes the programme, said it was seeking a female co-presenter who “does not have to be overly experienced or knowledgeable as we have plenty of expertise within the existing team”.
    Look forward to more dumbing down.

    Hopefully she being competent may be able to do 'eye candy' and explain the dig.

    from the look of the clothes in the photo Charlie Dimmock like moments may be available. Though not necessarily fully excavated.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    You expecting me to sit there and stare into her gaping hole whilst she grabs some old bone and tugs it off?
    No we assume you will be tugging along too

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    Or are the resident sexists assuming girl ex-model can't have a brain as well?
    ex-models can have a brain? what would they want that for?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    You expecting me to sit there and stare into her gaping hole whilst she grabs some old bone and tugs it off?

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    She has a masters in archeology, so if that's the reason he's quit then he's a dick, although he seems more displeased about the decision to dumb it down than having to work with her.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Terrible news - If Phil Harding goes too, that'll be pretty much the end for Time Team

    Why can't these effing producers leave things alone?
    She's hardly some thicko though:

    Miss Ochota, 30, holds a master’s degree in archaeology and anthropology from Cambridge University
    Or are the resident sexists assuming girl ex-model can't have a brain as well?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Terrible news - If Phil Harding goes too, that'll be pretty much the end for Time Team

    Why can't these effing producers leave things alone?
    Are you suggesting there should be actual educational content and not just entertainment? You will never fit in with the chavs like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    I hope she follows the Charlie Dimmock approach to her wardrobe

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Terrible news - If Phil Harding goes too, that'll be pretty much the end for Time Team

    Why can't these effing producers leave things alone?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a topic Time team to become worth watching?

    Time team to become worth watching?

    Mick Aston quits Time Team after producers hire former model co-presenter - Telegraph

    Lets hope Mary-Ann does not mind getting dirty.
    Last edited by BrilloPad; 8 February 2012, 12:55. Reason: typo

Working...
X