Reply to: The tags that made the cut

[MarillionFan]

Ain't that the truth

Are you calling Nats mum fat?

[TheFaQQer]

It was admin wot dunnit. Anyway, we've never been consistent. It's always arbitary and partial.

Ain't that the truth

[NotAllThere]

It was admin wot dunnit. Anyway, we've never been consistent. It's always arbitary and partial.

[MarillionFan]

Nothing like continuity of moderation.

You calling RH's lass a hoor again?

[TheFaQQer]

It's gone!

Nothing like continuity of moderation.

[mudskipper]

It's malicious stalking, but doesn't qualify as requiring clean up.

It's gone!

[NotAllThere]

I spent a good half hour finding all suity's threads and tagging them - I find the suggestion that the 'sicknote' tag doesn't qualify as malicious stalking quite insulting!


(I'll have to up my game...)

It's malicious stalking, but doesn't qualify as requiring clean up.

[mudskipper]

Any that result in the mods or admin having to clear them up. So, malicious stalking and naughty words.

I spent a good half hour finding all suity's threads and tagging them - I find the suggestion that the 'sicknote' tag doesn't qualify as malicious stalking quite insulting!


(I'll have to up my game...)

[Troll]

onomatopoeic

adjectival form innit? <starts googling>

[NotAllThere]

Pedantic I know but you did say "made the cut" which points to past tense and therefore any tag that was previously displayed is valid. Doodab may well be correct in his post.

Testicular nonsense. The cut was made in the past. Not the present or the future. If you ask who qualified for a game, you ask "who made the cut", meaning "who's in", not "who was in last time the cut was made before this time".

[NotAllThere]

What tags are allowed and which aren't?

Any that result in the mods or admin having to clear them up. So, malicious stalking and naughty words.

[mudskipper]

I believe the onomatopoetic word is spelled whoosh

onomatopoeic

[Troll]

--> woosh
EricBartlett

I believe the onomatopoetic word is spelled whoosh

[MarillionFan]

What tags are allowed and which aren't?

Any which start

Dimprawn is a fat xxxx

I believe are now acceptable. All others are considered out of bounds.

[EricBartlett]

--> woosh
EricBartlett

I think you probably meant:
--> woosh






EricBartlet

as it obviously went such long way over my head.