• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: The Euro

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Euro"

Collapse

  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    It would have taken 50 years to exhaust the new seams that the mine was built to exploit. Obviously only a tiny fraction of the UK's total energy needs, but still a waste.

    OK, politics apart, it was maybe uneconomical to mine it then, but wouldn't it have been better to 'mothball' collieries with remaining reserves, in case of long-term national need / war /blockade etc.

    They had to bring people over from South Africa to sink those shafts. What a waste.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    No simply that Greece is a good candidate for that sort of investment as well. Politically more stable and part of the EU, among other things.
    Greece is getting ready to blow. At some point in 2012 it will come unless Germany allows money printing.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    And your point is that this isn't possible?
    No simply that Greece is a good candidate for that sort of investment as well. Politically more stable and part of the EU, among other things.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by KimberleyChris View Post
    "Sadly we burnt all our coal 100 years ago".

    There's still at least 50 years worth of coal left at the bottom of Parkside colliery in South Lancs.

    You can't have it, because (instead of 'mothballing' it just in case we need it in future) they dynamited all the pit-head structures down the shafts for spite, and now you would need to sink new shafts.
    What do you mean by 50 years? It could be 250 years if you scrape the walls hard and long enough. Divide the amount down there by the UK's energy needs and you'll see it isn't 50 years. We've no coal left.

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    "Sadly we burnt all our coal 100 years ago".

    There's still at least 50 years worth of coal left at the bottom of Parkside colliery in South Lancs.

    You can't have it, because (instead of 'mothballing' it just in case we need it in future) they dynamited all the pit-head structures down the shafts for spite, and now you would need to sink new shafts.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Sadly we burnt all our coal 100 years ago.
    Still a few years yet. So we need to get on with fusion fast.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I don't like being dependent on anyone else for fuel. We should be opening coal fired power stations and pushing on with fusion.
    Sadly we burnt all our coal 100 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Wow, that's an ambitious plan!


    Desertec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    and being Germans, they will probably pull it off too, and end up world leaders in manufacturing the parts and selling they rest of us poor scrotes electricity. Assuming they can keep terrorists and disgruntled African/Spanish/French hands off it.
    I don't like being dependent on anyone else for fuel. We should be opening coal fired power stations and pushing on with fusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    And your point is that this isn't possible?
    Wow, that's an ambitious plan!


    Desertec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    and being Germans, they will probably pull it off too, and end up world leaders in manufacturing the parts and selling they rest of us poor scrotes electricity. Assuming they can keep terrorists and disgruntled African/Spanish/French hands off it.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I do not know of any socialist who has endowed money upon the poor. I would imagine however that the great philanthropists of our time were followers of Conservative ideals. One of the difference between conservatives and socialists is that they dont pretend to be something they are not (caring of the poor). There is no virtue in being a socialist whatsoever. Why on earth would anyone with a brain logically sustain an ideology that does not work unless they have another agenda?
    This chap maybe?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    The sahara is further away on the wrong side of the sea.
    And your point is that this isn't possible?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I think it's all a load of bollocks.

    There are some differences in policy but very little idealogical difference between this lot or the last lot, because the last lot copied this lot in order to get elected. This convergence is a natural state of affairs in a system which requires those seeking power to appeal to the general population.

    As regards ideologies, neither cartoon socialism or cartoon conservatism (more properly called economic liberalism IMO) is workable in practice.
    Absolutely - good analysis.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Well what do you think think then oh fellow "nothing better to do on a Saturday night" one
    I think it's all a load of bollocks.

    There are some differences in policy but very little idealogical difference between this lot or the last lot, because the last lot copied this lot in order to get elected. This convergence is a natural state of affairs in a system which requires those seeking power to appeal to the general population.

    As regards ideologies, neither cartoon socialism or cartoon conservatism (more properly called economic liberalism IMO) is workable in practice.

    Leave a comment:


  • KimberleyChris
    replied
    It's not polarised.

    I'm right and he's wrong :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Do you really think that any of our political parties have anything to do with either of the polarised ideologies you keep ranting on about?
    Well what do you think think then oh fellow "nothing better to do on a Saturday night" one

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X