Originally posted by jmo21
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Arrogant Rec Con! No....
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Arrogant Rec Con! No...."
Collapse
-
I quite liked his attitude and language. He could fit right in here.
Leave a comment:
-
Says in the article - Manchester Stark Brooks.Originally posted by sbakoola View PostI've dealt with a few agents like this in my time, I assume he was in a London recruitment firm, which one was he sacked from ?
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=3455018
Some nice recommendations:
"Decency and trustworthiness are sadly scarce commodities but Gary has both in bucketloads."
"Added to that he's a genuinely nice person, which helps enormously."
Yeah - that comes across in the email.
Leave a comment:
-
"I would like people to know that we are not all like Gary Chaplin."
yeah right
Leave a comment:
-
Frightening such arrogance receives such a large sum of money for making a few phone calls.
Leave a comment:
-
I've dealt with a few agents like this in my time, I assume he was in a London recruitment firm, which one was he sacked from ?
Leave a comment:
-
Wonder if any of our resident agents were on the email list?
What a fanny!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mr Chaplin (is he related to Charlie?)If you are not bright enough to learn how to bcc and thus encourage cockjockey retards to then spam everyone on the list then please **** off... you are too stupid to get a job, even in bankingIn the run-up to his resignation, Mr Chaplin, who was traced through his internet service provider, sent an increasingly frantic series of grovelling emails to the 4,000 people who saw his reply.
Leave a comment:
-
Arrogant Rec Con! No....
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Yesterday 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Leave a comment: