• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Developernomics

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Developernomics"

Collapse

  • PAH
    replied
    The natural progression is that things become easier as more 'black boxes' are built.

    Problem is if it becomes too easy it means lesser skilled people can try to replace the developers.

    Though often that results in more work for the developers after the management have tried to create their own solution with an Excel front end, or outsourced it to Bob thinking anyone can do it with minimal guidance.

    A lot of successful development is down to initiative and experience. That's what they expect from contractors.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Black-box software doesn't eliminate the need for programming. You just end up doing it with black-boxes as your datatype, instead of integers or whatever.

    Programming is about putting components together in layers. But unlike building a bridge, there's no top layer. As soon as you can put a conditional around a black-box, you end up with a new layer. Once you've built a bridge, you can't then use it in an über-bridge.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post
    I have thought about this, but it's the first time I have seen it summed up so well.
    But there's also a polarising effect, where the smartypants and specialists encapsulate software more and more flexibly in products which can then be used increasingly as a "blackish box" commodity by the rest of us.

    For example, how many people use JQuery - loads, and it's easy peasy. But how many people did it take to develop? A mere handful I imagine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Maginty
    replied
    ..
    Last edited by Jeff Maginty; 9 June 2022, 16:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    you have a great product at the right price but nobody buys it because the useless chavette at the till's yapping with her fat mates instead of serving customers.

    Only a problem if the product is only sold via those crappy outlets. The only ones suffering are the shops as people will just buy the same product elsewhere, and increasingly that elsewhere is online to avoid the bad shopping experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    It's always surprised me that while businesses spend heaps of money designing, producing and marketing their products and services and pay the people with the skills to do so quite handsomely, they pay crappy wages for those who'll actually be in contact with the consumer. That way, you have a great product at the right price but nobody buys it because the useless chavette at the till's yapping with her fat mates instead of serving customers.
    Yes well thats cos they are inevtably run by fu<kwits who put no value on service because you cannot measure a direct return in £$£$£$£$£

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
    True.

    This'll be the third year in a row that all the Christmas pressie shopping has been done online. No queuing for a parking space, trudging about in the wind and rain, being pushed from all angles, getting unbrellas in your face only to face the poor, ill-informed, often indifferent, and sometimes even rude service offered by most High Street retailers (despite facing declining sales) and to pay over the odds for the privilege too.
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    It goes further than that too. Music, movies, books, games, communication (TV, telephone, mail) all computerised, all requiring software.

    So if you're looking for a skill that can't either be computerised or outsource abroad, there's burger flipper, plumber, builder, electrician, and any other manual labour oriented skill.

    Everything else is up for grabs.
    It's always surprised me that while businesses spend heaps of money designing, producing and marketing their products and services and pay the people with the skills to do so quite handsomely, they pay crappy wages for those who'll actually be in contact with the consumer. That way, you have a great product at the right price but nobody buys it because the useless chavette at the till's yapping with her fat mates instead of serving customers.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    I've been thinking about becoming a plumber actually. I've always enjoyed flushing my pipes out.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    It goes further than that too. Music, movies, books, games, communication (TV, telephone, mail) all computerised, all requiring software.

    So if you're looking for a skill that can't either be computerised or outsource abroad, there's burger flipper, plumber, builder, electrician, and any other manual labour oriented skill.

    Everything else is up for grabs.

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Lots of stuff can be replaced with online services, as can be seen with the death of the high street.
    True.

    This'll be the third year in a row that all the Christmas pressie shopping has been done online. No queuing for a parking space, trudging about in the wind and rain, being pushed from all angles, getting unbrellas in your face only to face the poor, ill-informed, often indifferent, and sometimes even rude service offered by most High Street retailers (despite facing declining sales) and to pay over the odds for the privilege too.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Also true of the internet. Lots of stuff can be replaced with online services, as can be seen with the death of the high street.

    And they all need software too.

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    replied
    I have thought about this, but it's the first time I have seen it summed up so well.


    As software eats the world and every company turns into a software company

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Definitely true.

    On one project me and another 4 contractors (2 developers, 1 data messer-abouter, 1 tester, 1 project manger) were replaced with around 30 IBM numpties.

    Typically, the solution not only became unnecessarily more complex but the consultants raped the company on the usual service/support scam.

    IBM? I've tulip em.
    Last edited by PAH; 6 December 2011, 15:14.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    I know my place.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    The thing is, software talent is extraordinarily nonlinear. It even has a name: the 10x engineer (the colloquial idea, originally due to Frederick Brooks, that a good programmer isn’t just marginally more productive than an average one, but an order of magnitude more productive). In software, leverage increases exponentially with expertise due to the very nature of the technology.
    So true.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X