• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Should Reaction Engines be given a wodge of cash to build a working space vehicle?"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Grow tomatoes on Mars and ship them back to earth.
    LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    It's shame we haven't got the brains or gumption to get into thorium reactors too, which could be a game changer.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Seeing as the West has moved onto to limitless money printing, can't we have everything we've ever dreamed of now? It's all affordable now. Grow tomatoes on Mars and ship them back to earth. Every house can have a flying car on the drive. Put windmills on the top of Mt. Everest.

    I'm surprised the Zimbabweans didn't all fly off in rocket ships to Pluto. They had the money for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Presumably could be funded by a day's printing or so? If so, why not, there may be money in space, it is big after all.

    Get the Severn barrage funded too, that's proper inward investment. But we need a crash before we splash cash.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yes becuase the ability of the human race to establish a permanent self sufficent base off planet earth is vital to the survival of the species.
    Can we elect which eejits we jettison off to another planet away from us?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Yes, but only if we outsource all the work to India and then give India £5bn in aid as well. We want the lefties to be happy.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yes becuase the ability of the human race to establish a permanent self sufficent base off planet earth is vital to the survival of the species.
    It's also fairly vital to the survival of fluffy bunnies. Cute though they may be, fluffy bunnies have no chance of deflecting a mass-extinction asteroid. Something environmentalists seem unable to grasp.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Yes becuase the ability of the human race to establish a permanent self sufficent base off planet earth is vital to the survival of the species.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Yes, because it's bwilliant and that is more important than any normal political objection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Should Reaction Engines be given a wodge of cash to build a working space vehicle?

    10
    Yes
    60.00%
    6
    No
    30.00%
    3
    AndyW's mum's strap on love rocket is heading for uranus
    10.00%
    1
    What it says really. Should the government bankroll the development of Skylon or similar? It would certainly create some very good quality jobs and the end result could well be profitable.

Working...
X