Reply to: for the .netters amongst us

[ThomasSoerensen]

oss reference - nice - should keep the plebs out of my way for a while - so I can finally get time to do my stuff.

[pacharan]

<--- Dotnetter here

Now will you kindly tell me wtf this thread is about?

(And then perhaps I'll tell you how you can get multiple crackshots on Club Psycho Cash Beast)

[PAH]

I though that sound was tinnitus. I always get it while on a good rant.

[milanbenes]

Can you hear a whooshing sound?

quite


they totally missed your reference to the mother land


Milan.

[sasguru]

Ah yes, walking on the bleeding edge. I've seen .Netters try to become contortionists to keep up with all the latest nonsense M$ try to force on them.

Have fun trying to get a solution Live using a mish-mash of C# or F# or J# or VB.Net, MVC or ASP.Net (with jQuery or HTML5) or Winforms or WPF or Silverlight, Entity Framework or Data Services or ADO.Net or LINQ or stored procedures, and those are just the stuff available through Visual Studio. There's a myriad of 3rd party stuff to layer amongst all that.

They say you can't teach an old dog new tricks. This old dog sticks to C# or VB.Net (depending on the client's preference), ASP.Net, ADO.Net and stored procs. Fortunately that set is easier to maintain, faster to execute, easier to debug, easier to deploy, more secure, uses less resources, and doesn't require relearning every two years.

Can you hear a whooshing sound?

[PAH]

it's a .netters job to keep their eyes and ears open for which way the wind is blowing and be ready and prepared to tak and jive to follow the wave of what's in demand

Ah yes, walking on the bleeding edge. I've seen .Netters try to become contortionists to keep up with all the latest nonsense M$ try to force on them.

Have fun trying to get a solution Live using a mish-mash of C# or F# or J# or VB.Net, MVC or ASP.Net (with jQuery or HTML5) or Winforms or WPF or Silverlight, Entity Framework or Data Services or ADO.Net or LINQ or stored procedures, and those are just the stuff available through Visual Studio. There's a myriad of 3rd party stuff to layer amongst all that.

They say you can't teach an old dog new tricks. This old dog sticks to C# or VB.Net (depending on the client's preference), ASP.Net, ADO.Net and stored procs. Fortunately that set is easier to maintain, faster to execute, easier to debug, easier to deploy, more secure, uses less resources, and doesn't require relearning every two years.

[eek]

I am fully certifiable

Milan.

FTFY

[TheFaQQer]

I tried using Majestic, but got nowhere. I can't understand it.

[milanbenes]

If the stuff you develop in .Net is as user friendly as that then no wonder there's lots of opportunities for good contractors, who know how to deliver what the client wants and not what the .Netter wants to develop.

You may be on a .net gravy train but some trains get bogged down with the wrong sludge on the line.

pah thank you for the reminder

it's a .netters job to keep their eyes and ears open for which way the wind is blowing and be ready and prepared to tak and jive to follow the wave of what's in demand

Milan.

[doodab]

It's like a wind tunnel in here.

[PAH]

I googled it and the first 2 links where CUK

Mine too. Just as some have known for a while, Google gives you what it thinks you want to see, not an impartial list of results.

Therefore it's pretty useless when wanting to search THE WHOLE OF THE INTERNET. Google is run by a bunch of s.

[PAH]

you won't find this stuff on google

If the stuff you develop in .Net is as user friendly as that then no wonder there's lots of opportunities for good contractors, who know how to deliver what the client wants and not what the .Netter wants to develop.

You may be on a .net gravy train but some trains get bogged down with the wrong sludge on the line.

[milanbenes]

you won't find this stuff on google

it's all kept out of harms way behind nice firewalls and barriers to entry

as I said, nothing to see here

this is for bona fide .netters only

Milan.

[russell]

Russ,

please, do try to keep up at the back,

oss 1629598

is gonna create us a shed load of work for the first half of next year

nice

Milan.

I googled it and the first 2 links where CUK

[milanbenes]

So where does oss 1629598 fit in. Sound like he is a sockie making it all up, but that would never be allowed on CUK.

Russ,

please, do try to keep up at the back,

oss 1629598

is gonna create us a shed load of work for the first half of next year

nice

Milan.