• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Vase, vase or vase?"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    The judge didn't accept her argument that it had been abandoned, but was quite happy that the money for it belonged to the "original" owner, who was effectively receiving stolen goods! It having been looted during the Opium Wars.

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    They are selling for such extraordinary sums because the Chinese are buying them up. These vases were smuggled out of China decades ago and its a chance for the wealthy Chinese to get them back.

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    Whatever, it ain't yours.

    BBC News - Denbighshire family court fight over £228,000 vase

    What a singularly hideous object.
    I like it (wouldn't pay that much for it though).

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, apparently

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost

    Indeed. The vase is fairly appalling too.
    but obviously something very unusual

    It always amazes me how these dumb feckers can never seem to spot when something may be rare and/or valuable

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post

    What a singularly hideous object.
    That's not a nice way to describe Andrea Calland.

    Perhaps it would go nicely with this shiny thing: BBC News - Yellow Sun-Drop diamond goes for $10.9m at Sotheby's

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    started a topic Vase, vase or vase?

    Vase, vase or vase?

    Whatever, it ain't yours.

    BBC News - Denbighshire family court fight over £228,000 vase

    What a singularly hideous object.

Working...
X