• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Question for Fleetwood"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    PEDANT ALERT>>>>Erm, actually knickers used to come as two pieces, one for each leg - sort of the ultimate in crotchless. When someone found out that stitching them together made more sense (clever buggers, these Victorians) the name never changed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Fleetwood
    Dunno.
    Why did I have that last red wine at lunchtime?
    is it 'coz you is a lush?

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    Dunno.
    "Thong" performs the same function as "knickers", although in an infinitely more arousing fashion, and yet is singular.
    Why do you say "I went" instead of "I goed"?
    Why did I have that last red wine at lunchtime?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    started a topic Question for Fleetwood

    Question for Fleetwood

    Why is bra singular and knickers plural?
Working...
X