Originally posted by Ruprect
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: If bob worked for apple
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "If bob worked for apple"
Collapse
-
It just wasn't very funny. You didn't even bother finding an Indian chap doing the bobbing, 1/10 for effort.
-
WhooooshOriginally posted by Ruprect View Posterm, it was a visual joke based on apple bobbing

Leave a comment:
-
erm, it was a visual joke based on apple bobbingOriginally posted by DeludedAussie View PostAnd if Apple was filled with contractors what do you think would have been created?
A bankrupt company and contractors fleecing shareholders.
Face it - 99% of contractors are disguised employees earning more then they could in any other industry - I blame the shareholders for not controlling costs tightly enough
Leave a comment:
-
And if Apple was filled with contractors what do you think would have been created?Originally posted by Ruprect View PostI don't know if it would happen, but the outcome is likely to be something like this:

A bankrupt company and contractors fleecing shareholders.
Face it - 99% of contractors are disguised employees earning more then they could in any other industry - I blame the shareholders for not controlling costs tightly enough
Leave a comment:
-
If bob worked for apple
I don't know if it would happen, but the outcome is likely to be something like this:
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Splooosh
Leave a comment: