• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hector worried about incoming data quality"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Something to do with the quality of people that work in HR per chance???

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    started a topic Hector worried about incoming data quality

    Hector worried about incoming data quality

    Employers are being urged to get their PAYE paperwork in order, after more than 500 returns incorrectly claimed to employ “A N Other” in 2009/10.


    Every year, employers send PAYE data to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), which gives details of employees’ tax and national insurance contributions. However, it is not always accurate. This can cause problems for the employee, for example, incorrect amounts being deducted from their pay. It can also use up valuable employer and HMRC time and money putting the error right.

    As well as 507 A N Others, employer returns for 2009/10 revealed the following incorrect information:
    * 128 staff entered as Mr, Ms or Mrs “Dummy”
    * 572 people whose surnames only included the letter X, ranging from Mr X to Mrs XXXXXX
    * 75 staff with the surname “Casual”, 11 “Cleaners”, 9 “Workers” and 6 “Students”
    * 824 employees with the surname “Unknown” and
    * 40 people were apparently 200 years old or more after incorrect dates of birth were submitted.

Working...
X