• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "First annual fall since VAT was introduced in 1973"

Collapse

  • DaveB
    replied
    Bit more detail here.

    Apparently it's all down to Missing Trader fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bitbucket
    replied
    Treasury agenda

    Originally Posted by threaded
    Just because you build a machine to make hats doesn't mean you bear the responsibility if it is used to mask the face of a bank robber...
    I think as long as the Bank robber pays VAT on the hat then HM Gov. arnt going to be too bothered about the robbery anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    Just because you build a machine to make hats doesn't mean you bear the responsibility if it is used to mask the face of a bank robber...
    Nearly threaded but not quite; there is a difference between building something for an express legal purpose and profiting from it and building something that is unwittingly used for criminal activities.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    Just because you build a machine to make hats doesn't mean you bear the responsibility if it is used to mask the face of a bank robber...

    No longer true if the court cases in the US surrounding viloent films and video games are to be belived.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dundeegeorge
    replied
    Well, while that was previously true

    Originally posted by threaded
    Just because you build a machine to make hats doesn't mean you bear the responsibility if it is used to mask the face of a bank robber...
    don't be too sure it still is, or will remain so.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Just because you build a machine to make hats doesn't mean you bear the responsibility if it is used to mask the face of a bank robber...

    Leave a comment:


  • wc2
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent
    No Thank you all you contractors who (whilst making yourselves heaps of money) built and designed the technology that enabled so much work to be done offshore
    It seems that you are in a position putting contractors in position that has put the country in the position that it is in.

    Conclusion - It's Chico's fault

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist
    as predicted on this forum, if you off-shore your employment, they dont pay tax in this country. They dont buy things in this country. The off shorers make more profits - thank you brown stuff.


    No Thank you all you contractors who (whilst making yourselves heaps of money) built and designed the technology that enabled so much work to be done offshore

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    as predicted on this forum, if you off-shore your employment, they dont pay tax in this country. They dont buy things in this country. The off shorers make more profits - thank you brown stuff.


    Leave a comment:


  • bobhope
    replied
    I did it

    it was me de-registering from VAT last year :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • wc2
    replied
    What's VAT?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    started a topic First annual fall since VAT was introduced in 1973

    First annual fall since VAT was introduced in 1973

    Official data yesterday showed that VAT revenues tumbled nearly 14% in March compared with March last year. In the full fiscal year they were down 0.2% to £72.9bn - the first full-year drop. The fall in revenues is remarkable given that the economy has had two severe recessions since the early 1970s that did not cause VAT revenues to drop.

    Doomed I tell ya!

Working...
X