There are many many ways to waste time at work.. smoking is just one of them. Trying to find and book your next holiday is another, as is spending all day watching items you're bidding for on ebay. People should be judged on how much they actually produce, not in terms of how long they've sat at their desk for.
2 of the cleverest and hardest working contractors (yes they do exist) i've ever worked with smoked.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: You want a break? Pay for it!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "You want a break? Pay for it!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PintoWhenever I heard a complaint about cigarette breaks, it came from somebody who spent a lot of time chatting, particularly the women, who can spend a good 10 minutes discussing the previous evening's soaps, whereas to discuss work issues while having a smoke is deemed a work break. I also noticed that the moaners produced very little suggesting that the moaning was done to smoke screen their own inadequacies.Rock on Pinto.
Leave a comment:
-
I think this is a hideous idea and just one more step to disregarding workers as human beings. Plus, there is no logic to it at all. Human beings are what make up the workforce and human beings need to drink, refresh themselves and relieve themselves. To penalise them financially for doing these things has got to be a breach of human rights. Perhaps not with smoking though...nevertheless....
I smoke and do take the odd break morning and afternoon when I'm on site, but normally that's spent thinking about my job or having an informal business meeting on the doorstep with another colleague. I used to work with one colleague years ago, who also smoked, and I would suggest to him 'fancy a power fag?' We would then go outside and discuss work, not skive. Nicotine also helps me concentrate better on my work once I get back. What I never do, though, is surf the web during office hours or engage in forum discussions, like some do. The most I ever do is quickly check my home e-mails during lunchbreak (if there is one). Surely web surfing and going on forums during office hours is truly non-productive and should be treated the same way, if smokers too are going to be penalised? Yet, because they're wasting time at their desk rather than out on a doorstep they probably would be treated differently as this idea is related to desk absences.
As for withholding wages for toilet breaks. That is truly ridiculous and actually sexist too. Women have far more reason to visit the toilet and spend longer doing it for obvious reasons particularly at one time of the month. Men don't wear makeup and not expected to look attractive during office hours, only presentable and professional. Women need to re-apply make up and comb their hair more often because of its length and to just fit in with their other female co-workers. Plus their anatomy makes going for a pee a more drawn out process than it does for a man.
The whole idea is ludicrous - one step nearer for mankind being turned into Stepford dummies.
Resist comrades and fight for your rights.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostI used to find that a walk around the building or 10 mins staring out of the window helped enormously when stuck on some obscure problem... oddly management never seem to appreciate this.
Leave a comment:
-
Ex-Smokers
Originally posted by wendigo100
As it happens I admire ex-smokers for beating an addiction, but some are a bit too gobby about it so I wouldn't let them know that.
Are only gobby about it because it provides reassurance that they have done the right thing, it helps them stay on the straight and narrow.
As usual the anti-smoking mob are the usual suspects who like nothing more than telling other people what to do, what that is doesn't really matter smoking today, saving the planet tomorrow etc.
There is absolutely nothing to stop non-smokers popping outside for some fresh air as regularly as smokers if they want to.
People may be smoking outside but that does not mean they are not working, there was a time when you could smoke in meeting rooms so work continued whilst you smoked why do people assume its always a break? When I smoked I would frequently have meetings with people outside so we could smoke and work, I would take docs to read outside so I could smoke and continue working.
If a company employs someone they employ to sum total of that person and smoking may be a piece of baggage that comes with them that's very obvious whereas those that concern themselves with others behaviour are carrying another far more insidious those just as obvious piece of baggage that will ultimately do far more damage to your company than all the smokers in the world, they're not blameless after all they're spending too much time bitching about other people when they should be working.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joe Black...someone who understands at last.
"It's always amusing how smokers justify their addiction. I know, I used to do it myself. And yes, I did think of quite a few solutions on my fag breaks. Now I just look away from the screen for a couple of minutes (or post tulipe on here) and the same insights seem to occur."
Was hardly justifying any addiction sassy, was just point out the obvious, that people sitting at their desk all day aren't always the best to come up with an imaginative idea.
As for just looking away from the screen for a few minutes, I'd hardly compare that with looking up at the sky/clouds/birds, or perhaps some 'birds' walking by as a source of inspiration...seems like you have a parochial village mentality to me sassy, where the world doesn't exist beyond your cubicle...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by janeyYES... but also what you do with it
"It's always amusing how smokers justify their addiction. I know, I used to do it myself. And yes, I did think of quite a few solutions on my fag breaks. Now I just look away from the screen for a couple of minutes (or post tulipe on here) and the same insights seem to occur."
Was hardly justifying any addiction sassy, was just point out the obvious, that people sitting at their desk all day aren't always the best to come up with an imaginative idea.
As for just looking away from the screen for a few minutes, I'd hardly compare that with looking up at the sky/clouds/birds, or perhaps some 'birds' walking by as a source of inspiration...seems like you have a parochial village mentality to me sassy, where the world doesn't exist beyond your cubicle...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguruIt's always amusing how smokers justify their addiction. I know, I used to do it myself. And yes, I did think of quite a few solutions on my fag breaks. Now I just look away from the screen for a couple of minutes (or post tulipe on here) and the same insights seem to occur.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joe BlackWhile we're with the cliches/stereotypes I'd like to suggest that people who think workers should do nothing but sit in front of their screen all day, no doubt with a set of headphones on, probably shouldn't be running a business in the first place, and ipso facto are incapable of thinking 'outside the box' and bring about any sort of innovation.
I smoke, sometimes to much to my regret perhaps, but heck, the number of times I've worked for a company where everyone was sitting round staring a problem in the face until their eyes hurt, and I've gone outside for 5 minutes and had a fag, come back with a solution where I get asked the perenial question "how did you come up with that"...geez it ain't rocket science.
Joe in "small minds tend to think small thoughts" mode.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FranckoDoes size really matter then?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joe BlackJoe in "small minds tend to think small thoughts" mode.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguruCut out the wishy-washy stuff. Most smokers who carry on with the habit are mentally weak. All other things being equal, I would hire a non-smoker over a smoker any time.
I smoke, sometimes to much to my regret perhaps, but heck, the number of times I've worked for a company where everyone was sitting round staring a problem in the face until their eyes hurt, and I've gone outside for 5 minutes and had a fag, come back with a solution where I get asked the perenial question "how did you come up with that"...geez it ain't rocket science.
Joe in "small minds tend to think small thoughts" mode.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wendigo100As it happens I admire ex-smokers for beating an addiction, but some are a bit too gobby about it so I wouldn't let them know that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone GunmanI never succombed to anything. I was told I couldnt/shouldnt so I gave it a try as I have with a number of things. If I succumbed to anything it was curiosity.
I smoked for a long time believe it or not because I actualy enjoyed it.
I gave up because the enjoyment had gone.
I am still firmly in the smokers rights corner.
Not often I disagree with you Wendi but a bit too sanctimonious there.
As it happens I admire ex-smokers for beating an addiction, but some are a bit too gobby about it so I wouldn't let them know that.
Leave a comment:
-
Shame we can't smoke in the toilets - kill 2 birds with 1 stone (!?)
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: