• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Five-point growth plan by Balls"

Collapse

  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Coalition is the worst form of Government
    Why is it? Surely to have a single party means that they can implememt what they like for the term of their government. A coalition at least means that they have to convince their partners to back them.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TinTrump View Post
    How would a coalition be formed?
    Coalition is the worst form of Government

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by TinTrump View Post
    Many people would agree with your general sentiment but you must realise how impractical this is.
    He won't.

    Leave a comment:


  • TinTrump
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Candidates and especially parties must disclose all material changes they plan to do and in the event of suddenly doing different thing those who signed off manifesto go straight to jail.
    Sounds like you want Soviet style 5 year plans. How would a coalition be formed?
    Many people would agree with your general sentiment but you must realise how impractical this is.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    That's not good enough.

    Candidates and especially parties must disclose all material changes they plan to do and in the event of suddenly doing different thing those who signed off manifesto go straight to jail.
    Hardly fair. No plan survives changing circumstances. I think I better rule would be labour party membership - life sentence of hard labour in Siberia (crime being a clueless muppet).

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TinTrump View Post
    There are existing laws that deal with some types of deception by candidates seeking election to the Commons. Here's an example:-
    Phil Woolas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    That's not good enough.

    Candidates and especially parties must disclose all material changes they plan to do and in the event of suddenly doing different thing those who signed off manifesto go straight to jail.

    Leave a comment:


  • TinTrump
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It's about time new act was introduced to punish those attempting to obtain public office by deception.
    There are existing laws that deal with some types of deception by candidates seeking election to the Commons. Here's an example:-
    Phil Woolas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It does not matter what he says, some people just vote for the party anyway ...
    Pin a red rose to a donkey .. etc ... etc

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    Will anyone ever believe anything that comes out of his mouth ever again?
    It does not matter what he says, some people just vote for the party anyway ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Will anyone ever believe anything that comes out of his mouth ever again?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Apart from the fact they would probably all be migrant workers
    Ain't you a migrant workers yourself now Mr darmstadt?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    5) One-year national insurance tax break "for every small firm which takes on extra workers, using the money left over from the government's failed national insurance rebate for new businesses"

    #5 is the only one making remote sense and he is a complete idiot suggesting cut in VAT would make any difference apart from massive loss of tax revenue.
    Apart from the fact they would probably all be migrant workers

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    What I find amusing is how Balls now says that they won't know the state of the economy after current Govt, yet they were berating Conservatives for exactly the same answer just couple of years ago.

    It's about time new act was introduced to punish those attempting to obtain public office by deception.

    Leave a comment:


  • Waldorf
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    "1) Repeating the bank bonus tax - and using "the money to build 25,000 affordable homes and guarantee a job for 100,000 young people"
    2) Bringing forward long-term investment projects, such as schools, roads and transport, to create jobs
    3) Reversing January's "damaging" VAT rise now for a temporary period
    4) Immediate one-year cut in VAT to 5% on home improvements, repairs and maintenance
    5) One-year national insurance tax break "for every small firm which takes on extra workers, using the money left over from the government's failed national insurance rebate for new businesses"

    Source: BBC News - Labour conference: Balls unveils five-point growth plan

    #5 is the only one making remote sense and he is a complete idiot suggesting cut in VAT would make any difference apart from massive loss of tax revenue.
    1 - What jobs are these young people going to do, I always have doubts when I hear that politicians can guarantee jobs, does Balls want to copy the Italians where they have none jobs just to give people something to do and sod the debt?

    2 - Possible, but £5 billion will not turn it around on its own.

    3 - Balls is talking Balls - this will not make any difference other than adding to the existing debt, the last time they did this it did not change anything. Is the reduction of a TV from £500 to £490 really going to make people spend, spend, spend?

    4 - As someone said, much of this is evaded anyway, and will not make much difference, if any.

    5 - If a new employee was on £15K, is the saving of employers nic going to sway the decision? I doubt it and anyway, what about large employers, this is not consistent and is just a play to the unions and naive public.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Five-point growth plan by Balls

    Why does this remind me of Gordon's golden rules?
    Balls and Brown: both cheeks of the same felching, rotten, money grabbing, thieving, pension destroying, cultural marxist, common purpose, rancid, wealth destroying Liebour arse.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X