• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Speed kills! (hopefully)"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    "What would you rather save, 30 seconds or a life"

    I know that one. Most drivers would rather save 30 seconds IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Do you ever take your kids to the cinema? I bet you're a right irritating coont when you do.
    He's old enough to take himself to the cinema, thank god.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Funny, but their continuity is crap.

    Damage to the car is on the side opposite to the pedestrian when he gets hit. The number plate was already hanging off. The windscreen smashes before the guy hits it, it's clearly laminated but the woman still gets showered in glass. The pedestrian hits the front and bonnet of the car but there is no damage done to either. The damaged section never makes contact with the pedestrian.

    Shoddy work.
    Do you ever take your kids to the cinema? I bet you're a right irritating coont when you do.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Shoddy work.
    Time machine was a bit of stretch

    Reckless movie...

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Nice find

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    snip
    Funny, but their continuity is crap.

    Damage to the car is on the side opposite to the pedestrian when he gets hit. The number plate was already hanging off. The windscreen smashes before the guy hits it, it's clearly laminated but the woman still gets showered in glass. The pedestrian hits the front and bonnet of the car but there is no damage done to either. The damaged section never makes contact with the pedestrian.

    Shoddy work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    started a topic Speed kills! (hopefully)

    Speed kills! (hopefully)

Working...
X