Originally posted by zeitghost
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: UK joins laser nuclear fusion project
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "UK joins laser nuclear fusion project"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by zeitghostThe energy input to produce the 40 - 50lbs of 235 in the Hiroshima device must have been far in excess of the 12 - 15 kt yield.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostConversion for the Hiroshima device was about 1.5grams out of the 50 odd pounds of 235.
So pretty tulipty really.
Oddly, the energy release for fusion is a good deal less than the release for fission IIRC, it's just that you can scale the device by multistaging etc. to produce really enormous yields. (57Mt for the Tsar Bomba 3 stage for instance, which would have been 100Mt with a 238 tamper).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostIt's been 10 years away for the last 50 odd years, so I'm not holding my breath.
And there've been fusion boosted nukes since the 1940s*, the difficult bit was figuring out how to create a genuine bedouine H bomb**. Which are actually fission fusion fission as currently implemented.
*Alarm clock/layer cake
**Teller/Ulam staged design.
Leave a comment:
-
I afre with putting money into fusion. Along with nuclear reactors. Lets stop our dependancy on oil for energy.
But no way to joining forces with USA. Look what happened over race to sound barrier. We gave them our data with promise of getting theirs in return. It never materialized.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostI meant specific theories about fusion reactions, not high-level theory. We know fusion works because of the sun but that doesn't constitute a working plan.
Generating power is a different kettle of fish. It's like the difference between discovering fire and building an internal combustion engine.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostYes, Einstein proved it donkey's years ago. In theory the energy needed to bring fusing atoms close enough together is much less than the energy released, and in theory the energy released could be used to help along more fusions and a self sustaining reaction continue (the odds of fusion happening is related to temperature, pressure and some other variables). In practise, who knows.
Looking further into theoretical efficiency:
Using deuterium-tritium fuel, the resulting energy barrier is about 0.01 MeV.[citation needed]...The (intermediate) result of the fusion is an unstable 5He nucleus, which immediately ejects a neutron with 14.1 MeV.[citation needed] The recoil energy of the remaining 4He nucleus is 3.5 MeV,[citation needed] so the total energy liberated is 17.6 MeV.[citation needed] This is many times more than what was needed to overcome the energy barrier.
Nuclear fusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For one fusion reaction, 0.01 MeV in, 17.6 MeV out, or 1760 times as much out as in. But the energy out could instead be used to liberate further reactions and so the efficiency could approach 100%, minus the manufacturing the fuel, etc and other theoretical inefficiencies. I think they hope for 10 time as much out as in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostYes, Einstein proved it donkey's years ago. In theory the energy needed to bring fusing atoms close enough together is much less than the energy released, and in theory the energy released could be used to help along more fusions and a self sustaining reaction continue (the odds of fusion happening is related to temperature, pressure and some other variables). In practise, who knows.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostWhat's so funny?
You only need to reproduce the the conditions at the centre of a star here on earth, how hard can it be?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghost
Nah.
You only need to reproduce the the conditions at the centre of a star here on earth, how hard can it be?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI am not sure what bankers have got to do with this, other than the fact that 60% of their earnings go to government who should be supporting these sorts of projects.
Perhaps you're right, maybe when all the pluses and minuses are cancelled out they do actually end up with a pluses. Not at the moment though, it's minuses all the way, and bonuses?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostThey were talking about this on R4 this morning, apparently they're not too far off break even on energy in/out.
Could be the dawn of a new age?
Leave a comment:
-
They were talking about this on R4 this morning, apparently they're not too far off break even on energy in/out.
Could be the dawn of a new age?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: