Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Not tonight - Josephene....
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Not tonight - Josephene...."
Collapse
-
Actually, it was him:Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostShe must have used every excuse in the book! <If that doesn't make sense, I haven't read the article>
"The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets."
Leave a comment:
-
She must have used every excuse in the book! <If that doesn't make sense, I haven't read the article>Originally posted by k2p2 View PostPossibly no sex would be considered "unreasonable behaviour" and therefore grounds for divorce, although why it would take 21 years to realise it was a problem I'm not sure. I don't think the divorce was the point of the story, it was the 10K compensation.
Leave a comment:
-
Possibly no sex would be considered "unreasonable behaviour" and therefore grounds for divorce, although why it would take 21 years to realise it was a problem I'm not sure. I don't think the divorce was the point of the story, it was the 10K compensation.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostIs it not the same in the UK? Grounds for a divorce are not consummating the marriage?
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like either the judge is not married, or in a pretty shallow marriage. Presumably all those happy couples in their 80s who have been married half a century are loveless unions in his eyes.Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostBut a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other”
What a berk.
Leave a comment:
-
Is it not the same in the UK? Grounds for a divorce are not consummating the marriage?
Leave a comment:
-
Perhaps he considered it is small price for not having to have sex with her?
But it sounds like marriage is being defined as prostitution.
Leave a comment:
-
Not tonight - Josephene....
The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.
A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.
The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.
A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.
But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.
The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.
But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.
“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 7 September 2011, 21:56.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: