• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "May steps in to rescue London ..."

Collapse

  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Absolutely, although whether there are still some better targets left in the civil service and the quangos I'm not so sure.

    I think my brilliant solution would be to combine the emergency services. Basically they spend much of their time sitting about waiting for something to happen and very often, accidents, violent crimes or riots, they attend the same places. Combining them would raise the productive hours and reduce vehicles, coordination, radios etc.. Abolish regions, so they could respond to anything within a 100 mile radius.

    PS For SY's benefit edited above to insert violent crimes
    PPS Oh yes and just stuck an apostrophe in for Daily Mail readers

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Either way this is completely of Liebour doing - loaded up the country with debt, fecked up revenues with high taxes, the only logical outcome from this is public sector cuts
    Absolutely, although whether there are still some better targets left in the civil service and the quangos I'm not so sure.

    I think my brilliant solution would be to combine the emergency services. Basically they spend much of their time sitting about waiting for something to happen and very often, accidents, violent crimes or riots, they attend the same places. Combining them would raise the productive hours and reduce vehicles, coordination, radios etc.. Abolish regions, so they could respond to anything within a 100 mile radius.

    PS For SY's benefit edited above to insert violent crimes
    PPS Oh yes and just stuck an apostrophe in for Daily Mail readers
    Last edited by xoggoth; 8 August 2011, 22:26.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    Those forces alone will lose more than 5,000 frontline officers, with Greater Manchester Police forced to shed just under 1,600 – almost as many as London’s Metropolitan Police, which will axe just over 1,900. West Midlands Police will cut an estimated 1,250 of 8,500 frontline staff.
    Well, if the police in full riot gear just waits for some young scumbags to loot stores until they (scumbags) get bored and go home then might as well cut the costs.

    Either way this is completely of Liebour doing - loaded up the country with debt, fecked up revenues with high taxes, the only logical outcome from this is public sector cuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
    THERESA May’s cuts have left Police forces battling against the tightest cash squeeze in a generation.

    After the money police get from council tax, the average force in England and Wales will have 14% less cash in 2015 than today.

    But the pain will not been spread evenly. City of London Police is worst hit with a 19% income drop in the next four years after losing £21.4million. Many large forces will also be hit with cuts of more than 15% .

    Those forces alone will lose more than 5,000 frontline officers, with Greater Manchester Police forced to shed just under 1,600 – almost as many as London’s Metropolitan Police, which will axe just over 1,900. West Midlands Police will cut an estimated 1,250 of 8,500 frontline staff.


    so we can expect 14% more riots in 2015 than we have today ?


    wowzer






    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Still 1000's of the ****ers on the motorway looking for people commuting at 71 mph though.

    Sack the police and bring in the army.

    Sorted.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    started a topic May steps in to rescue London ...

    May steps in to rescue London ...

    THERESA May’s cuts have left Police forces battling against the tightest cash squeeze in a generation.

    After the money police get from council tax, the average force in England and Wales will have 14% less cash in 2015 than today.

    But the pain will not been spread evenly. City of London Police is worst hit with a 19% income drop in the next four years after losing £21.4million. Many large forces will also be hit with cuts of more than 15% .

    Those forces alone will lose more than 5,000 frontline officers, with Greater Manchester Police forced to shed just under 1,600 – almost as many as London’s Metropolitan Police, which will axe just over 1,900. West Midlands Police will cut an estimated 1,250 of 8,500 frontline staff.

Working...
X