Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
It is acceptable to make a noun from a verb (gerund), but the reverse is not so common. And in this case there is no adjective for "something that performs well". Well I suppose you have 'fast', but that does not cut it.
How about "Majestic"? No......I see what you mean.
English dictionaries can only follow the language, they don't lead it. I'd say your little bet is only valid if "performant" is not accepted for inclusion the next edition of the Oxford English
Performant is a difficult one. It isn't in the dictionary, but it probably should be.
It is acceptable to make a noun from a verb (gerund), but the reverse is not so common. And in this case there is no adjective for "something that performs well". Well I suppose you have 'fast', but that does not cut it.
Stupid made-up words. Once won a fiver off a Price Waterhouse Cooper guy by betting that 'performant' is not in fact English but a horrible made-up 'consultant's buzzword.
Been working recently on the 'Enterprisation' project where internationalisationability is of course important.
More mgtmntspk than just IT but twice in the last fortnight I have been reminded that we are not trying to boil the ocean here. That came as a relief.
English dictionaries can only follow the language, they don't lead it. I'd say your little bet is only valid if "performant" is not accepted for inclusion the next edition of the Oxford English
I remember much sniggering in C++ lectures about "friends having access to your private parts".
"Zombie process" is something I've been using a lot recently.
I was once asked to write a program to identify and kill "Zombie processes".
Since the phrase had no commonly recognised meaning on the operating system concerned, I hadn't a clue what was meant.
I never did get to the bottom of it, except it had drifted to the top of somebody's "To Do" list and our department got labelled as being "uncooperative" for not being mind readers.
I once tried to send a visio diagram via email at work. One of those automated security warning emails bounced back to my email, it told me that I was in breach of some security policy. I phoned up the security guys who looked into my visio email attachment. Our 'FAG servers' were the cause of my problem. Their email scans for naughty words, fag being one of them.
I had a computer shop for a couple of years earlier this decade and it was fairly normal for people to come in lugging either a PC or a laptop and say, "I hope you can help me with this. I've deleted the internet"
Leave a comment: