Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Airbus humps Boeing into submission at Paris airshow"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostI'm thinking an amalgamation of mechanical and electronic instruments, so if the electronics start playing up (as seem to have happened in both Airbus crashes I mentioned) the pilot can quickly press the 'sod off' button and take over using the old fashion methods. The problem then becomes how soon does the pilot realise the electronics are telling porkies and decide to take full control themself.
If you really believe the pilots do not have ultimate control of the aircraft, I tell you now no pilot would set foot on the flight deck.
Risk of an event at an airshow is always greater than reality because pilots are under more pressure to demonstrate A/C capabilities. Also the manoeuvres on display were very untypical of day to day operations, increasing risk. Like F1 drivers, the analysis that goes into keeping drivers alive and safe is amazing as full well the owners know an event is that much more likely than for ordinary road users.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostYour thinking a bigger window? "Look out! Trees!!"
Though maybe it's more cost effective to go the way they are and pay out compensation when it all goes engines up. Assuming they can't blame it on the (probably) dead pilot.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zara_backdog View PostEngine contol system is designed in the UK so that's something I suppose - but struggling to get the electonic engineers
Yes but goodrich an american company so the profits don't stay in the UK.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostAll we need now is a bigger slice of the work from the Frogs. You'd think that with a chocolate £ melting fast that UK manufacturing would be very attractive to Airbus, more than ever before.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostA pilot is only as good as the information he receives.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostA pilot is only as good as the information he receives.
Airbus may as well go one step further and have the planes flyable remotely if the pilots in situ are really the weak link.
BAE Mantis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostAh yes, British WasteOfSpace as it's now commonly become known among the engineering fraternity. Ever since Airbus pulled the jollys out 10 years ago we left. You know they used to have their own private A320 flying engineers over to Toulouse on a daily basis, business class seats, it was fantastic you felt quite important.
On the other hand GKN have invested heavily in composite technologies so the high tech stuff will be there for some time yet.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostBristol, the UK hub of aerospace engineering excellence.
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostYou're right though, they're on a continual recruitment drive for stress and materials engineers which explains the increase in the number of Bobs at Airbus and Rolls Royce Filton these days.
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostI know what I’ll be encouraging my kids to get into.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostGreat, so it will become harder and harder to avoid Airbus and their dodgy fly-by-wire glass cockpits.
Maybe I'm being paranoid, but since that very public A320 crash I've felt this is a step too far in reliance on technology. I'd much rather have a pissed up captain at the manual controls.
Here's the video of the A320 airshow crash I'm on about. I'm sure many people remember seeing it on the news:
YouTube - ‪France - Mulhouse - Airbus A320 Crash during auto landing‬‏
Pilot error all the way.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostYes because engineers are pouring out of every corner. We're don't have anywhere in the UK to make stuff and things, like.
The engineers have spoken and voted with their feet long ago. Being an engineer in the UK is a demeaning experience. More importantly our skills are portable.
You're right though, they're on a continual recruitment drive for stress and materials engineers which explains the increase in the number of Bobs at Airbus and Rolls Royce Filton these days.
I know what I’ll be encouraging my kids to get into.
Leave a comment:
-
Great, so it will become harder and harder to avoid Airbus and their dodgy fly-by-wire glass cockpits.
Maybe I'm being paranoid, but since that very public A320 crash I've felt this is a step too far in reliance on technology. I'd much rather have a pissed up captain at the manual controls.
Here's the video of the A320 airshow crash I'm on about. I'm sure many people remember seeing it on the news:
YouTube - ‪France - Mulhouse - Airbus A320 Crash during auto landing‬‏
Though thinking about it, maybe the common denominator is Air France, seeing as the two most famous Airbus crashes (the one I mention and the one that disappeared into the atlantic in 2009) have been from their stable.Last edited by PAH; 23 June 2011, 11:44.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: