• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Why have I stopped getting -ve rep?"

Collapse

  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Indeed - and, in fact, there doesn't seem to be any good reason for those elements to have an id attribute in the first place
    Come on Admin, let Nick make it anonymous again!

    Leave a comment:


  • Zippy
    replied
    Originally posted by k2p2 View Post
    It takes a modem to run a baudy house.
    It's a SYN.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    This integer variable walks into the pub and says to the manager 'this will be my 32,768th pint'


    The manager says 'get out. you've had one to many'






    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Code:
    #!perl
    # My Father, the Hacker v1.0 
    # by Yanick Champoux (12/9/2002)
    
    use Data::Dumper;  
    $diaper = new Data::Dumper   ([],[]);  # welcome to fatherhood, buddy 
    
    localtime => 'after supper';
    
    study $course or 'change baby ?';
    
    eval $ituation;
    
    $baby => glob happily;
    
    no warnings;
    
    $diaper->can( wait );
    
    $mother = grep @you, "wooooh, buster.";
    
    BEGIN{ /The/, speech }
    
    warn 2, put, perlgolf, @ the, index qw(and she would do it, too)    ,1
      or 2, map wife => hex;
    
    our $baby;   #she says
    
    listen "and nod a lot",
    s/igh/ 
    		yes, dear  
    /;
    
    grep @baby, '';
    
    open DIAPER;
    eof;
    push @away, y!u!ck!;
    dump 'into garbage bin';
    unpack new, diaper;
    waitpid   qw/
    	careful, boys can   /,sqrt/!                    
    /;
    close DIAPER;
    
    put, baby, 2, sleep;
    
    seek $wife,'s approval',
    	bless "strange hobby", 'now?';
    
    return "to perlgolf" if s.he does..;

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    'This complex For Next loop walks into the pub and the barman says 'That's Basic'

    "Get off!"
    It takes a modem to run a baudy house.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Anyone with a half decent contracting career who chooses to pursue a career in stand up needs their head examined.
    'This complex For Next loop walks into the pub and the barman says 'That's Basic'

    "Get off!"

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Have you ever wondered why your career as a standup comedian never took off.
    Anyone with a half decent contracting career who chooses to pursue a career in stand up needs their head examined.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Correct
    Oh dear - MF blows his credibility at the end by displaying a total inability to comprehend the code
    Hint: "FOR... NEXT" is a construct in FORTRAN/ALGOL-family languages. You clearly couldn't handle FORTRAN or ALGOL so you're probably harking back to your stumbling attempts to use a toy language like one of Microsoft's shoddy tries at BASIC.

    Have a look through this and pass comment when you've learned something about programming
    Have you ever wondered why your career as a standup comedian never took off.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    FTFY!
    No he didn't, FullyAutomatix did, shortly followed by a couple of others. Nick wrote the Javascript that makes it easy.
    Last edited by doodab; 22 June 2011, 06:10.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Nick didn't work it out. FA did. Nick then rode in on his Javascript horse...
    Correct

    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    ...and wrote a for next loop. Rivetting.
    Oh dear - MF blows his credibility at the end by displaying a total inability to comprehend the code

    Hint: "FOR... NEXT" is a construct in FORTRAN/ALGOL-family languages. You clearly couldn't handle FORTRAN or ALGOL so you're probably harking back to your stumbling attempts to use a toy language like one of Microsoft's shoddy tries at BASIC.

    Have a look through this and pass comment when you've learned something about programming

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
    " Is there no-one this poster won't flirt with? "


    (bloody true though)

    Leave a comment:


  • MaryPoppins
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    But. But , but I love you!.

    " Is there no-one this poster won't flirt with? "

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
    Screw you tuliphead. It's OVER!
    But. But , but I love you!.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaryPoppins
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    And the +ve's young Mary. Tell the whole story.
    Screw you shit:head. It's OVER!

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    FTFY!
    Nick didn't work it out. FA did. Nick then rode in on his Javascript horse and wrote a for next loop. Rivetting.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X