• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "We demand equal Rights.....sometimes!!!"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    As long as I get to shag Jenny Aguter that doesn't sound so bad
    Doesn't sound too good for her.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    And what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?
    Old farts not retiring eases the burden on younger people to support old farts, so yes, they have thought of that at least.

    As long as there is no discrimination, it's a free market out there for jobs. No reason why old farts shouldn't compete in it.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    As long as I get to shag Jenny Aguter that doesn't sound so bad
    Knock yourself out.

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    I suggest a Logans Run type future where anyone approaching the age of 25 goes to Wembley and floats upwards in a large swirling mass of people until they reach the top and are vaporised by a huge laser.

    I plan to just outside of Wembley with some cats.
    As long as I get to shag Jenny Aguter that doesn't sound so bad

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    I suggest a Logans Run type future where anyone approaching the age of 25 goes to Wembley and floats upwards in a large swirling mass of people until they reach the top and are vaporised by a huge laser.

    I plan to just outside of Wembley with some cats.

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    And what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?
    Young people are trying to find jobs ???

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    Women are considered the weaker sex and start losing their agility at work sooner than the hard toughened blokes. Hence the need for them to retire early. The retirement age for women should be lowered not raised. We are headed towards third world standards with such measures.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    And what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?
    The number of old farts out numbers the number of teenagers and people in their early twenties.

    It's a problem of demographics.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Child birth takes a lot from the female body, check out Beenies's boobies as an example. It is the people who retire at 16 on pseudo pensions that deserve the outrage

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    Women are considered the weaker sex and start losing their agility at work sooner than the hard toughened blokes. Hence the need for them to retire early. The retirement age for women should be lowered not raised. We are headed towards third world standards with such measures.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Do they ever?
    Keep calm and carry on™

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    have they thought this through?
    Do they ever?

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Problem is the cost of it.

    There aren't enough young people to support pensioners who are living whether in good or bad health for 35 years without working. Pensions where designed for people to live about a maximum 6 years after they stopped working.
    And what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Interestedly their colleague who was about 30 years older was paying into the shop pension scheme but as it was final salary would be better off than both of them.......
    Right up until the point that it was retrospectively changed to some lame-assed Money Purchase scheme, at which point it would plummet in value, leaving them almost as skint as their younger workmates.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Or reduce the total national pension outlay and let over-65s fight for it in a series of OAP Death Matches.

    Could be great TV.
    Even though the Glaswegians die younger I bet they would give those OAPs from the likes of Kensington and Chelsea a run for their money.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X