Originally posted by amcdonald
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: We demand equal Rights.....sometimes!!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "We demand equal Rights.....sometimes!!!"
Collapse
-
Old farts not retiring eases the burden on younger people to support old farts, so yes, they have thought of that at least.Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostAnd what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?
As long as there is no discrimination, it's a free market out there for jobs. No reason why old farts shouldn't compete in it.
Leave a comment:
-
As long as I get to shag Jenny Aguter that doesn't sound so badOriginally posted by MarillionFan View PostI suggest a Logans Run type future where anyone approaching the age of 25 goes to Wembley and floats upwards in a large swirling mass of people until they reach the top and are vaporised by a huge laser.
I plan to just outside of Wembley with some cats.
Leave a comment:
-
I suggest a Logans Run type future where anyone approaching the age of 25 goes to Wembley and floats upwards in a large swirling mass of people until they reach the top and are vaporised by a huge laser.
I plan to just outside of Wembley with some cats.
Leave a comment:
-
Young people are trying to find jobs ???Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostAnd what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostWomen are considered the weaker sex and start losing their agility at work sooner than the hard toughened blokes. Hence the need for them to retire early. The retirement age for women should be lowered not raised. We are headed towards third world standards with such measures.
Leave a comment:
-
The number of old farts out numbers the number of teenagers and people in their early twenties.Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostAnd what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?
It's a problem of demographics.
Leave a comment:
-
Child birth takes a lot from the female body, check out Beenies's boobies as an example. It is the people who retire at 16 on pseudo pensions that deserve the outrage
Leave a comment:
-
Women are considered the weaker sex and start losing their agility at work sooner than the hard toughened blokes. Hence the need for them to retire early. The retirement age for women should be lowered not raised. We are headed towards third world standards with such measures.
Leave a comment:
-
-
And what young people there are will find it harder to get jobs because the old farts aren’t retiring, have they thought this through?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostProblem is the cost of it.
There aren't enough young people to support pensioners who are living whether in good or bad health for 35 years without working. Pensions where designed for people to live about a maximum 6 years after they stopped working.
Leave a comment:
-
Right up until the point that it was retrospectively changed to some lame-assed Money Purchase scheme, at which point it would plummet in value, leaving them almost as skint as their younger workmates.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostInterestedly their colleague who was about 30 years older was paying into the shop pension scheme but as it was final salary would be better off than both of them.......
Leave a comment:
-
Even though the Glaswegians die younger I bet they would give those OAPs from the likes of Kensington and Chelsea a run for their money.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostOr reduce the total national pension outlay and let over-65s fight for it in a series of OAP Death Matches.
Could be great TV.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: