• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mutiny in the Ranks at Microsoft"

Collapse

  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot
    Take a look at this open source .NET application, written as a college senior project. 3 devs. 100,000 lines:

    Paint.net

    It works beautifully and it's got a nice 80-85% of Photoshop functionality.
    Thats a really nice program - I installed it yesterday and was able to get some damn good results very quickly

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by cswd
    Btw, hows the Office 2007 beta looking - I can't be arsed to screw my laptop up installing it.
    Mixed.

    The reason I signed up to the Beta was to see how my own applications worked and also to see if you could use

    VS2005
    VSTO2003
    Office2007

    I also wanted to try and call my .Net assembly from VBA in Office 2007.

    Current project written in Vb.Net/C# crashes Excel when you leave Excel, but in all other respects did work. Now all of a sudden no add-in seems to be working

    I'm going to bit the bullet and re-install everything.

    As this is my SKA ( (c) ATw ) I've decided to hold off on the Office 2007 version and develop against 2003. Partly because one of the USP's is that people will be familiar with it's use because it's built around Office. The interface in Office 2007 is sufficiently different to nullify that advantage. Also it means I only have to work on the engine which drives it. Not have to learn how to develop against a Beta version of Office.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Alt + F11?

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by waggle321
    Excel2007 still supports VBA, but you do have to look hard to find where it has been hidden.
    Prey tell. Could n't find it.

    Very useful for testing as my current project will be a .Net one anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • waggle321
    replied
    Excel2007 still supports VBA, but you do have to look hard to find where it has been hidden.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot
    BTW, among the comments is the following, which may interest anyone who likes using open source and seeing .NET code samples:

    Take a look at this open source .NET application, written as a college senior project. 3 devs. 100,000 lines:

    Paint.net

    It works beautifully and it's got a nice 80-85% of Photoshop functionality.
    I wish people wouldn't write good software for free. It really doesn't help.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    I always recommend Microsoft Windows to the competition.

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot
    Looks like there's widespread dissatisfaction inside Microsoft about the delays in releasing Windows Vista, if this recent discussion is anything to go by.
    <strike>The fun might start when Office 2007 comes out. I've been Beta Testing it and the one thing that seems to be missing is VBA. Can't find it at all.

    There is no Tools, Macro option. This leaves just .Net (C# or VB.Net) as the development language

    That should slow down take-up in the corporate sector given the investment in macros over the last decade or so.</strike>

    Well it seems (and not for the first time ) I'm talking moonshine, still can't find it though.
    Last edited by zathras; 29 March 2006, 08:43.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    because of the moduler design
    modular

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    If it was not for Steve Ballmer those guys would not have had (pretty secure and well paid) jobs.

    The matter of fact is that release date of Vista won't affect Microsoft's revenues - they will get pretty much the same payment from OEMs for a pre=installed Windows as they do now, its the hardware manufacturers who are stuffed, but then again, would they rather have OS released with buggy drives that don't work well on their hardware?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Considering the legal fights M$ have been in for the last few years, I guess, because of the moduler design, that one could unplug the browser, media player, WHY, from the OS and replace them. This upset the lead microsofties greatly so they told them to go back and swap things about in the various DLLs so it becomes a fairly impossible task.

    Remember you heard it here first!

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    started a topic Mutiny in the Ranks at Microsoft

    Mutiny in the Ranks at Microsoft

    Looks like there's widespread dissatisfaction inside Microsoft about the delays in releasing Windows Vista, if this recent discussion is anything to go by.

    If some of those guys had their way, Steve Ballmer would have to start calling himself Steve mer


    BTW, among the comments is the following, which may interest anyone who likes using open source and seeing .NET code samples:

    Take a look at this open source .NET application, written as a college senior project. 3 devs. 100,000 lines:

    Paint.net

    It works beautifully and it's got a nice 80-85% of Photoshop functionality.
    Last edited by OwlHoot; 29 March 2006, 07:02.

Working...
X