• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "O'Hare International Airport"

Collapse

  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I'm heading over to Las Vegas later in the year was wondering if it was worth making anything of my stopover in Chicago.

    Anyone been?
    Yep. Hancock Tower is pretty good if you like going up tall buildings. If you like deep pan pizza, go here: Gino's East Chicago

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    I'm heading over to Las Vegas later in the year was wondering if it was worth making anything of my stopover in Chicago.

    Anyone been?

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Is it just me or if Chicago's international airport website a little crap?
    A bit like the airport itself then.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post


    Emotion's are or Emotion is


    Emotions are

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post


    Emotion's are or Emotion is

    tHnaK yoU.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I'm British it's what we do.

    Emotion are not a prerequisite for posting, nevertheless, may your round parts grow cubic and fester at the corners.


    Emotion's are or Emotion is

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    So where on this marvellous website can I find the destinations it serves?

    Is a left luggage facility available?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    It's a bit crap if you prize looks over information. On the other hand, it seems to put all the ways to access the information you might actually need right up front, where such ways ought to be.

    Not knowing any flight numbers I wasn't able to search specifically on those, but it gave me information on every damn flight it had when I left the form blank and hit the button, which is better than many such sites.
    I am reminded of one wintry weekend when weather reports had me checking Manchester Airport to see if it would be open.

    It wouldn't let me in without creating an account, and once I'd done that I found it simply awful,

    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    It also uses one's default browser font size, rather than forcing one to endure whatever some designer in their early twenties likes to see on the super-duper monitor they themselves have, which is normally about 9px and entirely useless to anybody over the age of forty-five even if they have hipster frames on their spectacles.
    My all time prize went to an HP network management program. It was obvious that it had been developed on a whacking great screen, and this was at a time when you were lucky to have anything larger than a 14" CRT monitor on a typical office desk.

    Compaq, used a font size of 1 on its web site and refused to change it, in spite of many complaints. I'd regularly copy and paste stuff into a text editor to read it.

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    It's functional. I'd rather have a simple, usable site than an artwork you'd spend ages trying to navigate.
    There is the 'aesthetic effect' to consider - where a site's perceived usability is greater, the more beautiful the design... but this site is simple enough for that not to be too much of a factor. My favourite part of the site is the Terminal Tunes section - where you can search for music you heard by date/time/terminal. Cheese-tastic. O'Hare Music Tracker

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    It looks alright to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    It's a bit crap if you prize looks over information. On the other hand, it seems to put all the ways to access the information you might actually need right up front, where such ways ought to be.

    Not knowing any flight numbers I wasn't able to search specifically on those, but it gave me information on every damn flight it had when I left the form blank and hit the button, which is better than many such sites.

    It also uses one's default browser font size, rather than forcing one to endure whatever some designer in their early twenties likes to see on the super-duper monitor they themselves have, which is normally about 9px and entirely useless to anybody over the age of forty-five even if they have hipster frames on their spectacles.

    I loathe drop-down menus on web sites but theirs don't try to do smartarse tulip like animating, and the "Business Information" menu has "Contracting Opportunities" as its first option - in Chicago that probably means dumpsters or suchlike rather than anything we might be up to, but at least the opportunity is there.

    Overall, it's like one of those places where the receptionist is a bit plain but gets things done: much better than a place with a stunner on the desk who can't even dial the extension of the person you need to see.

    The information is there and you can access it. If you find the information unacceptable because the entity that delivers it hasn't shaved its legs, I would suggest that your priorities are wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I'm British it's what we do.
    Don't you dare hiding behind stereotypes - you are a cowardly whiny supposedly "charging high rates in euros" whino, ffs - given your boasts about how much you supposedly "earn" in euro land you should be using NetJets like very self respecting contractor starting with DimPrawn and ending with sasguru

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You whine too much.

    Did I mention I don't like you?

    I'm British it's what we do.

    Emotion are not a prerequisite for posting, nevertheless, may your round parts grow cubic and fester at the corners.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    You whine too much.

    Did I mention I don't like you?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    started a topic O'Hare International Airport

    O'Hare International Airport

    Is it just me or if Chicago's international airport website a little crap? Or have I indeed missed something...

    Chicago Department of Aviation

Working...
X