• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Is the population level sustainable?"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    New Labour are "subsidised exotic wasters". Their natural population density in Britain would be about 1 family per 10 square miles, rather than 1 every second house.

    If they had to earn themselves, there would be about one hundredth the number of them. And an awful lot more native tax contributors.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    As I was going to St Ives
    I met a man with seven wives
    Each wife had seven sacks
    Each sack had seven cats
    Each cat had seven kits
    Kits, cats, sacks, wives
    How many were going to St Ives?
    None. The dogs called in an Air Strike!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    There are ten million Cats in the UK and ten million dogs.

    What I want to know is, if they were all wild, and not kept and fed by us, what would the natural population be ? Also, if we went back ten thousand years, how many could the country support

    Too good to let them run around. Taste like chicken.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    Cats are "subsidised exotic predators". Their natural population density in Britain would be about 1 family per 10 square miles, rather than 1 moggy every second house.

    If they had to feed themselves, there would be about one hundredth the number of cats. And an awful lot more native birds.

    Domestic dogs are, well, domesticated, and have mostly lost the compulsion to predation, so do not impact the environment so much; but conversely might do so more if they were wild.

    Aha, thats what I wanted to know.

    Dogs might not predate, but they sure sh1t everywhere.



    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    There are ten million Cats in the UK and ten million dogs.

    What I want to know is, if they were all wild, and not kept and fed by us, what would the natural population be ? Also, if we went back ten thousand years, how many could the country support

    Cats are "subsidised exotic predators". Their natural population density in Britain would be about 1 family per 10 square miles, rather than 1 moggy every second house.

    If they had to feed themselves, there would be about one hundredth the number of cats. And an awful lot more native birds.

    Domestic dogs are, well, domesticated, and have mostly lost the compulsion to predation, so do not impact the environment so much; but conversely might do so more if they were wild.
    Last edited by Ignis Fatuus; 26 May 2011, 09:50.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by norrahe View Post
    Well a cat can have up to seven litters a year, so if we say an average of 3 kittens per litter and they can breed from 4 months onwards............. so you're looking at a lot of mouths to feed.

    Dogs only have 1 litter per year. So it looks like cat domination.
    Dogs can eat cats, so will thrive while the cat population explodes then crash once the cats start to starve due to overpopulation. Then it will all go round again.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    As I was going to St Ives
    I met a man with seven wives
    Each wife had seven sacks
    Each sack had seven cats
    Each cat had seven kits
    Kits, cats, sacks, wives
    How many were going to St Ives?
    Depends what he was claiming on his mileage forms

    Leave a comment:


  • Halo Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    As I was going to St Ives
    I met a man with seven wives
    Each wife had seven sacks
    Each sack had seven cats
    Each cat had seven kits
    Kits, cats, sacks, wives
    How many were going to St Ives?
    One (unless a Schizophrenic)

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Oh dear... Mrs EO let slip she prefers the kittys to you?

    not prefer, as such.
    Each and everyone has their own function, our cats catch mice and voles and show her affection. Dongo entertains her by moving his den every few days and running around in his little wheel. An I , er....erm..

    I know Im good for something. I'll get back to you




    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    As I was going to St Ives
    I met a man with seven wives
    Each wife had seven sacks
    Each sack had seven cats
    Each cat had seven kits
    Kits, cats, sacks, wives
    How many were going to St Ives?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    Oh dear... Mrs EO let slip she prefers the kittys to you?

    What? EO's Mrs prefers Pussy?

    She seems such a nice lady too.

    Goes to show, you never know...

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Let them stand on their own four feet, then we'll see how many of them can hack it



    Oh dear... Mrs EO let slip she prefers the kittys to you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    No, I wouldnt trust my cat with a bazooka, never mind an inter-continental ballistic missile.

    The point I am making is that these animals are living off handouts. A bowl full of whiskas is actually a subsidy.
    Let them stand on their own four feet, then we'll see how many of them can hack it



    The point I am making is that once you stop feeding them, things could get ugly. You need to think this through properly and in the meantime, keep feeding them. If I'm an hour late with my kitty's dindins, he's in the cutlery drawer looking for the tomato knife.

    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    There are ten million Cats in the UK and ten million dogs.

    What I want to know is, if they were all wild, and not kept and fed by us, what would the natural population be ? Also, if we went back ten thousand years, how many could the country support

    Well a cat can have up to seven litters a year, so if we say an average of 3 kittens per litter and they can breed from 4 months onwards............. so you're looking at a lot of mouths to feed.

    Dogs only have 1 litter per year. So it looks like cat domination.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    No, I wouldnt trust my cat with a bazooka, never mind an inter-continental ballistic missile.

    The point I am making is that these animals are living off handouts. A bowl full of whiskas is actually a subsidy.
    Let them stand on their own four feet, then we'll see how many of them can hack it

    Aren't you being Non-Opposable-Thumbist?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X