• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Uk full steam ahead for Nuclear power"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    Won't happen ever. I mean, didn't happen ever. Or else where are the time travellers? I haven't seen any.
    What about Threaded?

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    Won't happen ever. I mean, didn't happen ever. Or else where are the time travellers? I haven't seen any.
    It's pretty much the same situation as with bisexual nymphomaniacs who enjoy pounding each other with massive strap on rubber cocks. That is to say, I've only ever seen them in films, but I don't doubt they exist.

    Maybe they are being discrete.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Time travel is already in the planning phase too. Won't happen in our lifetime unless you are planning to live to be 5000+
    Won't happen ever. I mean, didn't happen ever. Or else where are the time travellers? I haven't seen any.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You stumbled into a thread where grown-ups were talking about Nuclear Power, which I had rather boringly diverted down a sidestreet of Mile-High Buildings that might possibly be built one day on notoriously shifting sands, and actually be up to 1/3 of a mile short of the full mile. You, quite justifiably, rubbished this latest crazy notion of mine, by which time everyone else had either moved on or fallen asleep.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I feel a bit sorry for you Shaun. You stumbled into a thread where grown-ups were talking and tried to contribute, but then you couldn't find a way out.

    I've found a thread more suited to your level of debating technique and scientific knowledge: http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...vs-coffee.html

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Yes, but I never claimed to know more than the news agencies.
    Hardly surprising given your obvious intellectual limitations. In your shoes I'd be wary of taking on the village goat at a Pub Quiz.


    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Or a god-bothering plastic-geordie knucklehead.
    Yes, but I never claimed to know more than the news agencies.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's more reliable than a west-country IT bumpkin.
    Or a god-bothering plastic-geordie knucklehead.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    It's more reliable than a west-country IT bumpkin.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You probably missed that part, it was about 50 pixels down the page
    "several news agencies"...................mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Wikipediapoo!!!
    In April 2011 several news agencies report that the plan has been approved and that the building will cost almost 30 billion US dollars.
    You probably missed that part, it was about 50 pixels down the page

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    In May 2008, soil testing in the area cast doubt over whether the proposed location could support a skyscraper of significant height, MEED reported that the project has been scaled back, making it "up to 500 meters shorter".[7]

    Reports in 2009 suggested[8] that the project had been put on hold due to the global economic crisis and that Bechtel was "in the process of ending its involvement with the project".[
    Wikipediapoo!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by PRC1964 View Post
    Yes, welcome to what we were already discussing.

    Leave a comment:


  • PRC1964
    replied
    *cough*

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Again, what's changed since the Burj Kalifah to support this?
    The Global Credit Crunch?
    I know the Arabs have plenty of money to burn, but if they are going to keep throwing good after bad trying to polish turds like Man City, then it will soon run out. Then they can get back to their camels and duststorms where they belong.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X