Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
He does seem an educated go getter and risk taker as opposed to a bedwetting, skirt wearing, devolution begging, football dullling, oil complaining, buckfast swigging, ginger wig wearing, fair skin burning, freckled wife beating, cousin marrying, sheep intestine eating inbred.
So yes, you may have a point.
Standing up for sasguru..............tsk tsk................mind you, it is not as if he can do it for himself I suppose. Blessed as he is with a head that is emptier than a Haitian's lunchbox.
I do believe with his 'winning' personality and people skills you could detect a bit of 'Septic Tank' in him.
He does seem an educated go getter and risk taker as opposed to a bedwetting, skirt wearing, devolution begging, football dullling, oil complaining, buckfast swigging, ginger wig wearing, fair skin burning, freckled wife beating, cousin marrying, sheep intestine eating inbred.
Is it known exactly what part was illegal? Was it the filming and recording? because I assume if he'd liked men and gone into the men's toilets, it wouldn't be illegal.
It is an offence under the Sexual Offenses Act (2003) to "seek sexual gratification by observing/ recording/ broadcasting another person doing a private act." (such as undressing, having sex or anything you would not ordinarily do in public). The gender of the victim is irrelevent.
He'd already admitted the offence according to the article.
Hardman, who had previously admitted watching someone during a private act for his own sexual gratification,
Is it known exactly what part was illegal? Was it the filming and recording? because I assume if he'd liked men and gone into the men's toilets, it wouldn't be illegal.
Leave a comment: