- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Wind Turbines to smother Wales
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Wind Turbines to smother Wales"
Collapse
-
We are drifting away from the point here. The whole concept of smothering Wales was reputedly on offer. For me, regardless of the possible environmental damage, that must be a price worth paying...............think of the children!
-
Well that depends how many orders of magnitude more sun-power are available. Considering the sun provides all the energy for tornadoes and such things, there is quite a bit of breathing room.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostWhatever fuel or energy sources you use, usage is rising exponentially. That's your real problem.
Moving the earth a bit closer to the sun would also free up loads of energy IIRC.
Leave a comment:
-
Whatever fuel or energy sources you use, usage is rising exponentially. That's your real problem.
Leave a comment:
-
Large chunks of the world get by on charcoal.Originally posted by d000hg View PostYes, apart from you need to be planning ahead how much fuel you need by millennia and we weren't around to make those plans for the usage right now. Plus we're cutting most of them down. Plus they pollute rather badly.
(OK, they tend to be warm and only need it for cooking)
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, apart from you need to be planning ahead how much fuel you need by millennia and we weren't around to make those plans for the usage right now. Plus we're cutting most of them down. Plus they pollute rather badly.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostBest way so far has been to use plants, trees are best.
Wait for them to grow, then bury them for a substantial period of time, this substantially changes the material making it easier to transport and giving more energy per kilo when burnt.
Biology does seem like a good route though. Modify a tree to produce petrol instead of sugar, and so on. Apart from they need water and the hottest places are a bit dry. Pure physics works well in the dry desert by contrast.
Leave a comment:
-
Best way so far has been to use plants, trees are best.Originally posted by d000hg View PostFrom a common-sense perspective, solar seems the best long-term renewable energy source to me, globally speaking. Before jumping in about pollutants and efficiency and so on, note the key phrase "long-term". The energy is there to be taken, we just need a better way to harvest and distribute it.
Wait for them to grow, then bury them for a substantial period of time, this substantially changes the material making it easier to transport and giving more energy per kilo when burnt.
Leave a comment:
-
By the same logic:Originally posted by stek View PostWind turbines slow the wind down, too many of them and the wind will stop. I read that in K-PAX...
Given that the prevailing winds go in the same direction as the rotation of the earth, won't too many windmills speed up the earth?
Leave a comment:
-
From a common-sense perspective, solar seems the best long-term renewable energy source to me, globally speaking. Before jumping in about pollutants and efficiency and so on, note the key phrase "long-term". The energy is there to be taken, we just need a better way to harvest and distribute it.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe it's national_usage/number_of_people which includes business use, traffic lights, etc, not just homes themselves?
Leave a comment:
-
By my calculations that’s 2-3 kettles on constant boil for 24 hours a day? Shirley not??He said: "The average energy used per person in the UK is 125 kilowatt hours per day. To achieve even 20 kilowatt hours per day per person it will require enough wind turbines to cover an area the size of Wales.
Or are they factoring 'average energy used' by taking car, air, and food miles into account which makes no difference in calculating how much electricity we require.
Leave a comment:
-
Wind turbines slow the wind down, too many of them and the wind will stop. I read that in K-PAX...
Leave a comment:
-
Great on-line book. He fixates on carbon though.Originally posted by pjclarke View PostBlimey, a Telegraph article from 2008! You're really doing your homework.
The hook for the article was the publication of David Mackay's book 'Sustainable energy without the hot air'. Available as a free download if you're interested, Not bad, though I percieve he has a pro-nuclear, anti-renewables bias.
The Telegraph want (well, wanted a few years ago) you to take away this message:
Which of course is a selective quote, as most wind turbines are going offshore, and in the coming decades wind will be just part of the mix... to quote the book directly ...
Here is some more recent news
If solar deserts were practical propositions one might wonder why Australia hasn't gone in that direction yet, which appears more doable there than the Middle East. It might have been him that said solar is waiting for a cost revolution.
Leave a comment:
-
Old, old news
Blimey, a Telegraph article from 2008! You're really doing your homework.
The hook for the article was the publication of David Mackay's book 'Sustainable energy without the hot air'. Available as a free download if you're interested, Not bad, though I percieve he has a pro-nuclear, anti-renewables bias.
The Telegraph want (well, wanted a few years ago) you to take away this message:
Which of course is a selective quote, as most wind turbines are going offshore, and in the coming decades wind will be just part of the mix... to quote the book directly ...He said: "The average energy used per person in the UK is 125 kilowatt hours per day. To achieve even 20 kilowatt hours per day per person it will require enough wind turbines to cover an area the size of Wales.
Here is some more recent news...we get all the green electricity from a mix of four sources: from our own renewables; perhaps from “clean coal;” perhaps from nuclear; and finally, and with great politeness, from other countries’ renewables. Among other countries’ renewables, solar power in deserts is the most plentiful option. As long as we can build peaceful international collaborations, solar power in other people’s deserts certainly has the technical potential to provide us, them, and everyone with 125 kWh per day per person ...
Leave a comment:
-
It's a brave man that puts career and reputation on the line with such media scoundrels
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18

Leave a comment: