He'll be back.

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

amcdonald replied

29 April 2011, 09:46
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post

Do sequels with ancient actors revisting their famous roles ever work? The last Sean Connery James Bond film, the last Harrison Ford Indiana Jones film?

I didn't think the last Indy film was that bad especially considering how old he is now, it was about as good as you could expect
Leave a comment:
xoggoth replied

28 April 2011, 17:16
Do sequels with ancient actors revisting their famous roles ever work? The last Sean Connery James Bond film, the last Harrison Ford Indiana Jones film?
Leave a comment:
2BIT replied

28 April 2011, 16:44
Originally posted by zeitghost

Which timeline(s) clearly forget about the parallel timelines generated by the Sarah Connor Chronicles which cunningly skip over about 10 years from 1995 to 2005 at one bound.

Not to mention stranding John Connor in a post Judgement Day world as a teenager & leaving him there.

think the article its from mentions the Sarah Connor Chronicles but I cant remember T3 and haven't seen the SCC - either way makes no sense!
Leave a comment:
2BIT replied

28 April 2011, 12:49
Terminator Timeline

shame they messed the franchise up - last one wasn't too bad to be fair but the whole thing no longer makes any sense
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

28 April 2011, 12:14
Terminator 4 wasn't too bad actually - they have plenty of books too, not too badly written especially between T2 and dreadful T3. Later different (cheaper?) writers were used so plot is more dumbed down even though I have to admit that after Sara blown up 2nd secret base in Arctic it became harder and harder to believe the plot in the first place...
Leave a comment:
wobbegong replied

28 April 2011, 11:56
Originally posted by zeitghost View Post

'Terminator 5': Can this franchise (and Arnold Schwarzenegger) be good again? | PopWatch | EW.com

Hasta La Vista, Baby.

I wonder who'll be John Connor this time.

In a remarkable twist of fate, it turns out that the terminator is actually John Connor. Repaired with cybernetic implants after a life threatening accident and sent into the service of the terminators. He's doomed to continually go back in time to try to catch himself without ever succeding.
Leave a comment:
zeitghost started a topic He'll be back.

28 April 2011, 11:48
He'll be back.

'Terminator 5': Can this franchise (and Arnold Schwarzenegger) be good again? | PopWatch | EW.com

Hasta La Vista, Baby.

I wonder who'll be John Connor this time.
Tags: None