• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Pravda's view on the Libyan situation"

Collapse

  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    I always hope that foreign secretaries have actually had some foreign experience prior to taking up the job. But these days all you need is a degree from oxbridge, proof that you grew up posh and met people from abroad.
    I think that a track record of porking foreign ladies ought to be a prerequisite.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Who gives a tulip about Pravda?

    Under the Soviet regime Pravda was the official Communist Party newspaper, and served as a useful indicator as to what the ruling elite in Moscow might be thinking. With the collapse of the USSR it was closed down, by a decree issued by Yeltsin in 1991.

    The entity that now calls itself Pravda is just some tabloid paper that picked up the old name in the hope people would be dumb enough to assume it was related to the original and therefore important. Think in terms of the Daily Star renaming itself as the Parliamentary Press Office whilst having no connection with Parliament whatsoever and you'll get the idea.
    And the Soviet Government's paper was Ivestiya (News), hence the Soviet joke, 'In the Truth there is no News, and in the News there is no Truth'.

    Except Russian language doesn't have articles. In Russian language that sentence shows how bloody complicated Russian is, both nouns are each shown in different cases;

    V Pravde net izvestiy, v Izvestiyakh net pravdy....

    Russian lang. is well interesting!

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post

    The entity that now calls itself Pravda is just some tabloid paper that picked up the old name in the hope people would be dumb enough to assume it was related to the original and therefore important. Think in terms of the Daily Star renaming itself as the Parliamentary Press Office whilst having no connection with Parliament whatsoever and you'll get the idea.
    Ah, right. That would explain the hysterical overwrought tone of the piece.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    I always hope that foreign secretaries have actually had some foreign experience prior to taking up the job. But these days all you need is a degree from oxbridge, proof that you grew up posh and met people from abroad.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Who gives a tulip about Pravda?

    Under the Soviet regime Pravda was the official Communist Party newspaper, and served as a useful indicator as to what the ruling elite in Moscow might be thinking. With the collapse of the USSR it was closed down, by a decree issued by Yeltsin in 1991.

    The entity that now calls itself Pravda is just some tabloid paper that picked up the old name in the hope people would be dumb enough to assume it was related to the original and therefore important. Think in terms of the Daily Star renaming itself as the Parliamentary Press Office whilst having no connection with Parliament whatsoever and you'll get the idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • pacharan
    replied
    Russia today is similarly enlightening. Ate they English or RussiAns who speak hoof English?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Sysman View Post
    Haven't most conflicts in recent years dragged out a lot longer than expected?
    It will be all over by Christmas.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    Agree, but that is surely down to Cameron and not Hague? Although Hague hasn't exactly shone during this period (remember the claims that Gadaffi was already flying to Venezuela?) it's Cameron who's responsible for this situation (along with Sarkozy).
    I wonder how much at the mercy of the Civil Service they are. I'm thinking along "Yes Prime Minister" lines.

    Originally posted by MrMark View Post
    I think he was hoping for a quick regime change, and now we're stuck in a stalemate with dangers of mission creep.
    Haven't most conflicts in recent years dragged out a lot longer than expected?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I think we should get WOPR running the show and ditch the short guy who never went to public school.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMark
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I'm starting to wonder if the Government hasn't botched the whole thing, in what seems like their frantic eagerness to be "doing something".
    Agree, but that is surely down to Cameron and not Hague? Although Hague hasn't exactly shone during this period (remember the claims that Gadaffi was already flying to Venezuela?) it's Cameron who's responsible for this situation (along with Sarkozy). I think he was hoping for a quick regime change, and now we're stuck in a stalemate with dangers of mission creep.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I'm starting to wonder if the Government hasn't botched the whole thing, in what seems like their frantic eagerness to be "doing something".
    Can't help but agree with you on that one. It's a farking mess and they have made themselves look like naive political wannabees...

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Well the view of Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, a long-time Pravda columnist

    Libya: Where William Hague got it wrong

    crikey, he doesn't think much of Hague
    Timmy-Banchy says more about himself in that little tantrum.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I'm starting to wonder if the Government hasn't botched the whole thing, in what seems like their frantic eagerness to be "doing something".
    Most certainly but he was hang out to dry ...

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    Hague is all right.

    He lost some prestige with that botched "diplomat" mission into Libya though.
    I'm starting to wonder if the Government hasn't botched the whole thing, in what seems like their frantic eagerness to be "doing something".

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Hague is all right.

    He lost some prestige with that botched "diplomat" mission into Libya though.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X