• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Fed up with rising gas and electricity prices?"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    I dont think one has to read the technical details to know that something that violates the basic laws of conservation is unlikely to be anything but a con.

    Initally I thought it meant vacuum literally, a big long tube that you poke up into outer space and the vacuum sucks up the air turning a small impeller to drive the generator. That would work.

    A balloon on a very long string that you sent up into the slipstream would be a good idea too, the string turns a winch to power the dynamo. When you come to the end of the string, a signal releases the ballon and you send up another, which also rewinds your first bit of string. And the signal could deflate the balloon so you could reuse that too.

    Of course if NASA had had the sense to tie a piece of string to the moon when they were up there that would have been even better; it could have towed a big train round and round the earth with no electricity cost at all.

    PS Lots of articles quoted, not same as participants. They seem to be real enough. Whether the right conclusions are drawn is another matter.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 19 March 2006, 18:13.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    It's always amusing when people reveal their ignorance
    sorry to disagree but I find it more amusing when people reveal their willies

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    It's always amusing when people reveal their ignorance

    Leave a comment:


  • Fungus
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    Actually he's right. Recent theoretical studies have shown that going back in time would be possible and would not violate current physics. As to how you do it, well just read posts by Chico and Knob Jockey. Well, at least it feels like you're going back in time.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    According to all the Maths (and I think some empirical evidence) it is possible to go back in time.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman
    Understands what, exactly? Please elucidate.

    Does he understand that making smug-sounding comments of the "Ah ha! I know better than you Pygmies" sort, without bothering to explain his own 'theory' to the rest of us benighted plebs makes him look like an utter tosser?
    Agreed. Threaded is a fraud and a sad one at that.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    That's what I meant, yes. We used to model the universe with gods and the supernatural in order to make sense of it, and they were very successful in their day too.

    Are strings the new goat entrails?
    There is a big difference between religious/supernatural and scientific methods of modelling the world. The former doesn't allow contradiction, while the latter does - waiting till a better model comes along. Thus by small increments we get closer to the truth (with occasional Kuhnian shifts). It is ironic that the greatest flowering of science in the latter half of the 20th Century also coincided with the "invention" of post-modernism, IMHO the revenge of the stupid for the humiliation they had to endure at school.

    PS Your earlier post is also wrong. According to all the Maths (and I think some empirical evidence) it is possible to go back in time, which is just another dimension in the space-time continuum.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Fungus
    "Don't we just pretend it is a dimension for practical reasons"

    Depends what you mean by pretend. We make lots of assumptions in order to derive theories which agree - or not - with experiment. General relativity and other theories model time as a dimension and they are very successful. If string theory can be used to make predictions, or to derive the values of the cosmological constants, then it's not really pretending.
    That's what I meant, yes. We used to model the universe with gods and the supernatural in order to make sense of it, and they were very successful in their day too.

    Are strings the new goat entrails?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    I believe there are 42 + 7i dimensions

    This is where the answer to life the universe and everything comes from and also why most peoples lucky number is seven.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Fungus
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    As I understand it, space is the first, second and third dimensions, by definition. What is this fifth dimension?

    Time is always the same for everything and everyone. Nothing can travel backwards in it. Don't we just pretend it is a dimension for practical reasons like scheduling, applied maths and stuff?
    Kaluza Klein theory postulated a fourth spatial dimension, coiled up on itself:

    http://www.matter-antimatter.com/kal...ein_theory.htm

    Modern string or brane theory further increases the number of spatial dimensions.

    "Don't we just pretend it is a dimension for practical reasons"

    Depends what you mean by pretend. We make lots of assumptions in order to derive theories which agree - or not - with experiment. General relativity and other theories model time as a dimension and they are very successful. If string theory can be used to make predictions, or to derive the values of the cosmological constants, then it's not really pretending.

    I suppose we could collectively put our fingers in our ears and shout "Can't hear you" whenever a theoretical physicist spouts off. (If you work in theoretical physcis it feels like that anyway.)

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by The Master
    Just as time is the fourth dimension, space is the fifth, for space is completely boundless and knows no time. There, I hope that's clear.
    As I understand it, space is the first, second and third dimensions, by definition. What is this fifth dimension?

    Time is always the same for everything and everyone. Nothing can travel backwards in it. Don't we just pretend it is a dimension for practical reasons like scheduling, applied maths and stuff?

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by cswd
    Wahey someone who understands!!!
    Understands what, exactly? Please elucidate.

    Does he understand that making smug-sounding comments of the "Ah ha! I know better than you Pygmies" sort, without bothering to explain his own 'theory' to the rest of us benighted plebs makes him look like an utter tosser?

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Shall we go through the one again where you're walking towards a train at 5 kph and the train hits you at 200 kph ...

    Giving time a dimension is just a trick to make a model, it isn't reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Well the "Good" Doctor and the Glorious Leader seem to manage ok...

    And the War Criminal James Tiberius Kirk has been leaping back & forth like a fiddler's elbow too, not to mention Quark, Janeway and Sisko.
    Oh feck, another trekkie.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Master
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    What is a dimension, anyway? How can anyone be "in the fifth dimension"?
    Just as time is the fourth dimension, space is the fifth, for space is completely boundless and knows no time. There, I hope that's clear.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X