- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Be afraid, be very afraid
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Be afraid, be very afraid"
Collapse
-
Kill everyone in the public sector. (Apart from the missus, she deserves every penny)
-
Originally posted by benn0For poverty, unemployment and crime, look no further than the state the country was in in the mid 80s.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by benn0We're all doomed then - So why not **** of now it's so bad here?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by benn0We're all doomed then - So why not **** of now it's so bad here?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentIt most certainly was labours. If you remember thanks to socialism the IMF had to be brought in to rescue the economy in the mid 1970s. Thatcher carried out the reforms that were necessary to free vital services from the clutches of the Unions and to similarly free private enterprise to be able to compete and stand on its own two feet in a global economy.
Unfortunately the economy had to go through some serious blood letting because people like you ignored what was really happening to the economy.
History is repeating itself and there may not be a Thatcher to sort the problems out the next time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentUnfortunately the economy had to go through some serious blood letting
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by benn0I'm not spinning it as anything.
For poverty, unemployment and crime, look no further than the state the country was in in the mid 80s.
Oh yes, that was labour's fault as well wasn't it?
.
Unfortunately the economy had to go through some serious blood letting because people like you ignored what was really happening to the economy.
History is repeating itself and there may not be a Thatcher to sort the problems out the next time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by benn0
Rose tinted spectacles. Wonderful things.
Where you wearing the same Rose tints when Maggie rode rough over this country? War with the Argies eh? Stamping out Industry in this country.(And I'm not a Labour boy)...My point is we can all take this attitude towards our parental political bulltulip that we are fed....you only sound like a Man united fan slagging off a Leeds fan to me!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sunnysanMaybe they shoudl stop piloting schemes to pay children not to misbehave.
Leave a comment:
-
Hear Hear
Maybe they shoudl stop piloting schemes to pay children not to misbehave.
Maybe they should consider why they have a metropolitan authority to control the Met when the home secretary and the mayor shoudl have that responsibility.
Maybe they should stop wasting time passing bullsh1t bills thought parliament to try and achieve there own agenda.
Maybe they should concentrate on streamlining the public service to make it more effective, and not that does not mean empty fist banging rhetoric, it actually means firing load of the useless c@nts that are not needed
Maybe they should stop flirting with privatisation and actually either privatise or nationalise transport becuase they have created an expensive f£ckup which is less efficient and cr@pper than either alternative.
Maybe they should simplifly tax regulation to encourage enterprise rather than trying to stifle it.
Maybe they should stop trying to tell everybody what do do and how to live, and concentrate on what they supposed to do, and thats run the country efficiently.
Maybe they should at least set a precedent on ministerial conduct instead of fostering a culture of corruption and non-accountablity.
Maybe then they may find the money to plug the pensions deficit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentFor a start they are responsible for creating the black Hole through taxes, through creating an over bloated state and by killing the pension sales Industry. They indulge themselves in hugely wasteful socialist projects that fail to deliver any sort of decent public service. They are then driven to paper over the cracks (poverty unemployment, crime) that their socialist poilicies have created by taking more and more money from private industry which has the knock on effect of killing the goose and drawing more and more people into the patronage and dependence of the state.
So dont spin it as if it is a problem that they are somehow bravely confronting.
I'm not spinning it as anything.
For poverty, unemployment and crime, look no further than the state the country was in in the mid 80s.
Oh yes, that was labour's fault as well wasn't it?
We've always had scroungers. I know people who never did a days works during the tory years, through choice, yet managed very well thank you very much. They're no better or worse off these days.
These days however, if you want to work you can. Ask anyone who worked in the buliding trade through the 80s whether it was the same then.
Rose tinted spectacles. Wonderful things.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by benn0The article in question is merely stating that the government is looking at ways of plugging the pensions black hole. What're they supposed to do, bury their head in the sand?
So dont spin it as if it is a problem that they are somehow bravely confronting.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: