• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Would blowing up Fukushima help?"

Collapse

  • singhr
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    How about pumping water in to keep the radioactive stuff cool until the proper cooling systems can be restored, then decommissioning the reactors in a controlled manner once it has all cooled down?
    When is the next earthquake/tsnunami due?

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    How about pumping water in to keep the radioactive stuff cool until the proper cooling systems can be restored, then decommissioning the reactors in a controlled manner once it has all cooled down?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Plan C :

    1. Transport a couple of dozen giant bulldozers to the site by sea, and I mean those ones with thirty foot diameter wheels they use in open cast mines.

    2. Blast and excavate (as necessary) a huge trench along the side of each building on the landward side, and several hundred feet deep. Pile the removed earth on the far side of the trench to the building.

    3. Plant explosive charges along the base of the trench on the side of the building, with the aim of collapsing that side of the trench so the building tumbles into the trench.

    4. bulldoze the previously excavated earth and rock over what remains.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by singhr View Post
    Would blowing up Fukushima help?
    Yeah - Nuke it !

    Oh hang on....

    Leave a comment:


  • Dearnla
    replied
    I vote for Bedford.

    Didn't BP open a website for people to send in their suggestions on how to stop the Gulf Oil leak?

    I think the Japanese government should do the same - there's some brilliant ideas on here.

    Although I'm going to keep quiet on the debate about population reduction, as I've only spawned 5 kids....

    Leave a comment:


  • singhr
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    And how shall we accomplish this "reduction"? Spread diseases? Ask people nicely to stop *******?
    I've no idea how to keep the population down and having done my bit for increasing it over the years really shouldn't be talking about it, but I don't think importing overseas workers to wipe our sh*tty ars*es in care homes, who in turn generate another generation who will need their ars*es wiping, is sustainable.

    I quite like Martin Amis's suggestions on the subject myself
    Last edited by singhr; 17 March 2011, 14:44.

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Fair enough. Perhaps we should ask for volunteers for our population reduction program. Some people are bound to put their hands up.


    (currently sitting very carefully, 2 days post-op)

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Fair enough. Perhaps we should ask for volunteers for our population reduction program. Some people are bound to put their hands up.
    mmm. thinking outside the box eh ? ok i thought about it, now im off for a sh@g.




    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Credit where it's due Doodab,

    he's thinking outside the box. Something we should all do now and then

    Fair enough. Perhaps we should ask for volunteers for our population reduction program. Some people are bound to put their hands up.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
    At singhr's house.

    singhr's SO : "Darling, I hate to tell you, but you've left a floater in the upstairs WC"

    singhr : "No worries. Right on it." <packs WC with 2 kilos of semtex>

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Credit where it's due Doodab,

    he's thinking outside the box. Something we should all do now and then



    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by singhr View Post
    Jeeze - what a mess. Imagine if this was happening in Cumbria right now. The only good thing that will come out of this is for people to take a very long look at what politicians and experts are proposing on UK plc's energy policy. Is this our last chance to turn away from nuclear power and instead re-focus on renewables and population reduction? I really hope so. As a kid who grew up in the 60's fearful of nuclear war, I wouldn't wish that nuclear cloud hanging over the heads of generations to come just because this generation was so selfish.
    And how shall we accomplish this "reduction"? Spread diseases? Ask people nicely to stop *******?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    looks like the global warming movement might take a blow:

    How Japan’s tsunami threatens the global warming movement | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Thinking about it, a better solution to comprehensively bury the whole mess would be to skip the TNT but drill a ring of much smaller holes deeper, perhaps half a mile, round the landward side of each building about quarter of a mile away.

    Then plant a 10 kiloton nuke at the bottom of each. Again, if these were detonated in the right pattern, it would raise a huge assymetric mound of earth that would plonk itself over the entire site to a depth of perhaps several hundred yards.

    Obvously it would help if the molten (and radioactive) rock from the explosion didn't reach the surface in significant amounts (although I suppose some vapour would inevitably jet through the disintegrating higher layers); but by calculating the depth correctly one could ensure the right amount and direction of earth displacement with no craters being formed.

    And I'm being serious here - It's amazing what can be done with coordinated explosions, and if the alternative is a festering smoking radioactive ash heap they may have to consider something like that.
    I believe you are being serious. I really really hope you don't deal with anything remotely related to public safety for a living.

    You aren't going to be able to move a "huge asymmetric mound of earth" without letting a load of radioactive tulip out, because in order to avoid letting the radioactive tulip out you need to ensure that the explosion is buried deep enough that all you get is a sealed in cavity underground that may or may not collapse at a later date leaving a crater on the surface.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Here is an update:

    Fukushima Status

    From what I understand a handful of people have been irradiated with levels comparable Aberdeen background radiation levels.

    Of course I do agree with everyone that this is an absolute catastrophe and we should immediately close all Nuclear power stations and sit in the dark, with paper bags over our heads.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X