- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The clue is in the bloody name!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The clue is in the bloody name!"
Collapse
-
"I know you got elected Barack Hussein Obama, but we just cannot give you the job"
-
Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostIf we can trim down the ability for Muslims to work in most areas of work and then deny them benefits - because there are lots of jobs available - perhaps they'll get fed up and leave.
Though that could be difficult as they'd be banned from planes, trains, buses, ferries, boats.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostFranck Ribery???
see which hand he wipes his bum with
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postthats a tricky one indeed.
Abu Hamza or John Adams ? sheeet, we'll have to toss a coin boys
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bob The Drummer View PostAre you saying that no convert to Islam without a criminal record would ever apply for an airline job?
Also, this additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - who would decide which names were Muslim-sounding, and on what basis would these decisions be made?
Abu Hamza or John Adams ? sheeet, we'll have to toss a coin boys
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostNope, you're quite right. However his criminal record should preclude him from working in aviation. Oh and the fact that he converted to Islam in prison and his association with certain mosques and clerics may have been a big clue.
Are you saying that no convert to Islam without a criminal record would ever apply for an airline job?
Also, this additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - who would decide which names were Muslim-sounding, and on what basis would these decisions be made?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostIf we can trim down the ability for muslims to work in most areas of work and then deny them benefits - because there are lots of jobs available - perhaps they'll get fed up and leave.
Though that could be difficult as they'd be banned from planes, trains, buses, ferries, boats.
I see it now.
Leave a comment:
-
If we can trim down the ability for muslims to work in most areas of work and then deny them benefits - because there are lots of jobs available - perhaps they'll get fed up and leave.
Though that could be difficult as they'd be banned from planes, trains, buses, ferries, boats.
I see it now.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bob The Drummer View PostThis additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - presumably intended to uncover radicalisation and/or links to terrorist suspects - it wouldn't have been applied to Richard Reid, would it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by amcdonald View PostBut then you're discriminating against non Muslims, by saying they could be Muslim terrorists
Yes, we can be more suspicious of people with a Muslim background wanting to work for an airline, or any other group as we please.
But we cannot act on those suspicions in such a way that those groups are treated differently, because that would be illegal discrimination.
If we want to be suspicious about any particular group and subject them to additional checks, those checks must be applied to all.
Which, given Mohammed-the-bomber-Ali-Fatwa, or Paddy "Squaddy Sniper" O Reilly, or even Norman Nutjob, might apply under the name of Billy Bunter, might be a good idea anyway.
HTH instead.Last edited by RichardCranium; 1 February 2011, 16:54.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostOriginally posted by Bob The Drummer View PostCould you clarify:
- Are you proposing that applicants for airline jobs with Muslim-sounding names should be barred from applying/screened out at the very first stage?
- Or that such applicants should be subject to additional vetting beyond that already in place?
Yes, I am.
Originally posted by Churchill View PostRichard Reid didn't work for an airline and I would have hoped that any vetting would have highlighted his and his fathers criminal tendencies.
This additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - presumably intended to uncover radicalisation and/or links to terrorist suspects - it wouldn't have been applied to Richard Reid, would it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostOr a Dutch Hoe a Dutch Hoe.
or a swede a turnip
your turn
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: