- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The clue is in the bloody name!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The clue is in the bloody name!"
Collapse
-
"I know you got elected Barack Hussein Obama, but we just cannot give you the job"
-
Ban the Muslims from public transport and there'll just be a handful of Sikhs trying to run all the trains, the buses and London Underground.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostIf we can trim down the ability for Muslims to work in most areas of work and then deny them benefits - because there are lots of jobs available - perhaps they'll get fed up and leave.
Though that could be difficult as they'd be banned from planes, trains, buses, ferries, boats.
Leave a comment:
-
50/50Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostFranck Ribery???
see which hand he wipes his bum with
Leave a comment:
-
Franck Ribery???Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postthats a tricky one indeed.
Abu Hamza or John Adams ? sheeet, we'll have to toss a coin boys

Leave a comment:
-
thats a tricky one indeed.Originally posted by Bob The Drummer View PostAre you saying that no convert to Islam without a criminal record would ever apply for an airline job?
Also, this additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - who would decide which names were Muslim-sounding, and on what basis would these decisions be made?
Abu Hamza or John Adams ? sheeet, we'll have to toss a coin boys
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostNope, you're quite right. However his criminal record should preclude him from working in aviation. Oh and the fact that he converted to Islam in prison and his association with certain mosques and clerics may have been a big clue.
Are you saying that no convert to Islam without a criminal record would ever apply for an airline job?
Also, this additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - who would decide which names were Muslim-sounding, and on what basis would these decisions be made?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Don't be a ***** all your life.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostIf we can trim down the ability for muslims to work in most areas of work and then deny them benefits - because there are lots of jobs available - perhaps they'll get fed up and leave.
Though that could be difficult as they'd be banned from planes, trains, buses, ferries, boats.
I see it now.
Leave a comment:
-
If we can trim down the ability for muslims to work in most areas of work and then deny them benefits - because there are lots of jobs available - perhaps they'll get fed up and leave.
Though that could be difficult as they'd be banned from planes, trains, buses, ferries, boats.
I see it now.
Leave a comment:
-
Nope, you're quite right. However his criminal record should preclude him from working in aviation. Oh and the fact that he converted to Islam in prison and his association with certain mosques and clerics may have been a big clue.Originally posted by Bob The Drummer View PostThis additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - presumably intended to uncover radicalisation and/or links to terrorist suspects - it wouldn't have been applied to Richard Reid, would it?
Leave a comment:
-
OK then, pedantry-pants.Originally posted by amcdonald View PostBut then you're discriminating against non Muslims, by saying they could be Muslim terrorists
Yes, we can be more suspicious of people with a Muslim background wanting to work for an airline, or any other group as we please.
But we cannot act on those suspicions in such a way that those groups are treated differently, because that would be illegal discrimination.
If we want to be suspicious about any particular group and subject them to additional checks, those checks must be applied to all.
Which, given Mohammed-the-bomber-Ali-Fatwa, or Paddy "Squaddy Sniper" O Reilly, or even Norman Nutjob, might apply under the name of Billy Bunter, might be a good idea anyway.
HTH instead.Last edited by RichardCranium; 1 February 2011, 16:54.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Churchill View PostOriginally posted by Bob The Drummer View PostCould you clarify:
- Are you proposing that applicants for airline jobs with Muslim-sounding names should be barred from applying/screened out at the very first stage?
- Or that such applicants should be subject to additional vetting beyond that already in place?
Yes, I am.
Originally posted by Churchill View PostRichard Reid didn't work for an airline and I would have hoped that any vetting would have highlighted his and his fathers criminal tendencies.
This additional vetting for applicants with Muslim-sounding names - presumably intended to uncover radicalisation and/or links to terrorist suspects - it wouldn't have been applied to Richard Reid, would it?
Leave a comment:
-
er..Originally posted by zeitghostOr a Dutch Hoe a Dutch Hoe.
or a swede a turnip
your turn
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Leave a comment: