Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I have been waiting for this for some time. They have voted against one of the things I wanted, but made the following a directive.
I would appreciate thoughts from the well informed on the proposal that this will allow us to work as self-emp again.
My argument:
Many of us would rather be self emp than Ltd. (I still want to be Ltd but would settle for self emp till my company feels right for Ltd.)
The reason we are not self emp is a state enforced restriction which makes clients responsible for unpaid tax should a self emp contractor fail to pay, which is why most clients and agents insist on us being Ltd.
This would appear to be in conflict with the above statement.
Strikes me that this refers to some countries which insist that the Self-employed work in full-employment. I believe France is like this.
In some EU Countries you will find you cannot use your limited company.
I have been waiting for this for some time. They have voted against one of the things I wanted, but made the following a directive.
In addition, member states must not apply "contractual arrangements between the provider and the recipient which prevent or restrict service provision by the self-employed".
I would appreciate thoughts from the well informed on the proposal that this will allow us to work as self-emp again.
My argument:
Many of us would rather be self emp than Ltd. (I still want to be Ltd but would settle for self emp till my company feels right for Ltd.)
The reason we are not self emp is a state enforced restriction which makes clients responsible for unpaid tax should a self emp contractor fail to pay, which is why most clients and agents insist on us being Ltd.
This would appear to be in conflict with the above statement.
Leave a comment: