• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "New horror for txt spk haters - numeronyms"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    If we must simplify why not go back to Egyptians?. I would enjoy sending letters to an insurance company consisting of little doodles of elephants and things.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    I understand J00
    Last edited by Spacecadet; 17 December 2010, 11:16.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    R u 4 real?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    I've seen i18n used quite a lot but never a11y.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    That's 50 8100dy 1337!

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    started a topic New horror for txt spk haters - numeronyms

    New horror for txt spk haters - numeronyms

    I've been studying the O'Reilly book "Dojo: The Definitive Guide", for a clientco web app, and have been seeing a few bizarre shortened words such as "i18n" and "a11y".

    Turns out these are called numeronyms (and those two are short for "internationalization" and "accessibility" respectively)

    Anyone seen many of these? have they been around for a while, maybe a spin-off from text speak?

Working...
X