Reply to: New Climate Model from NASA scientists

[RichardCranium]

I saw a dead frog last year.

Was it Jacques Cousteau?

[Doggy Styles]

I saw a dead frog last year.

[EternalOptimist]

you guys wont be laughing when all the polar bears, frogs and butterflies have died. last year wasnt it

[DimPrawn]

Cosmic rays only effect clouds which are weather related not climate related!

HTH

I think you've hit the nail on the head. We have a warming climate but with 200 years of freezing weather ahead.

[Spacecadet]

Tax the sun out of the sky!

Tax solar panel companies, they're the greedy ones profiteering from the great flaming globe of doom in the sky

[Spacecadet]

Looks like it was the cosmic rays after all:

The Great Beyond: Sunny days for CLOUD experiment

Sometimes scientists get it completely wrong, but usually other scientists come along and put it right.

Interesting isn´t it how around the globe in Argentina, North America, China, Europe, how the winters have got progressively colder since the sun went quiet.

I think when these guys publish AGW will be dead, especially since it is abundantly clear the trend for colder winters will continue.

Cosmic rays only effect clouds which are weather related not climate related!

HTH

[DimPrawn]

Looks like it was the cosmic rays after all:

The Great Beyond: Sunny days for CLOUD experiment

Sometimes scientists get it completely wrong, but usually other scientists come along and put it right.

Interesting isn´t it how around the globe in Argentina, North America, China, Europe, how the winters have got progressively colder since the sun went quiet.

I think when these guys publish AGW will be dead, especially since it is abundantly clear the trend for colder winters will continue.

I post a series of links the other days showing record breaking cold around the globe in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 etc.

Strangely enough the solar minimum started at this time and peaked at a low last year and this year.

It's almost as if the sun has some influence on our climate rather than a few ppm of a mild greenhouse gas.

Tax the sun out of the sky!

[BlasterBates]

Looks like it was the cosmic rays after all:

The Great Beyond: Sunny days for CLOUD experiment

Sometimes scientists get it completely wrong, but usually other scientists come along and put it right.

Interesting isn´t it how around the globe in Argentina, North America, China, Europe, how the winters have got progressively colder since the sun went quiet.

I think when these guys publish AGW will be dead, especially since it is abundantly clear the trend for colder winters will continue.

[Doggy Styles]

Actually, the snow has stopped in London and the sun has come out. Does that prove it?

[DimPrawn]

Bring back the death penalty.

But only for those who oppose the great AGW religion.

Jihad!

[EternalOptimist]

Great, you've just asked him to post another 1000 climate warming links

well...'false equivilence' i ask you

thats saying that we dont count because we oppose the orthodoxy. I wonder if pj would ever consider using force to get his way over these issues ?

if the dissenters get their way and continue to destroy the planet, would he consider violence ?

[Spacecadet]

I hear that the frogs didnt die due to AGW after all, and the polar bears are doing ok, and there is ice at the north pole and the sea hasnt swallowed up Holland.

why dont you come back when you have something real pj. something tangible.

signed - a tiny minority of irrational, holocaust denying, voodoo science, dissenters, whose views dont count.

Great, you've just asked him to post another 1000 climate warming links

[EternalOptimist]

The Register demonstrates how climate myths are created

I hear that the frogs didnt die due to AGW after all, and the polar bears are doing ok, and there is ice at the north pole and the sea hasnt swallowed up Holland.

why dont you come back when you have something real pj. something tangible.

signed - a tiny minority of irrational, holocaust denying, voodoo science, dissenters, whose views dont count.

[EternalOptimist]

And feel free to draw your own conclusions.

I do.

good luck pj in everything , and a happy Christmas

[pjclarke]

Brilliant, so there are errors on both sides,

Ah, so now you bring up the idea of false equivalence, of two 'sides', both equally flawed. Sorry, but this is simply wrong. What we actually have is an overwhelming majority amongst scientists who spend their professional lives studying these matters that human activity is affecting the climate in a potentially extremely damaging way, versus a tiny percentage of dissenters who, for whatever reason, resist this idea.

Consider, for a moment, the evidence. Go read the IPCC reports , or the summaries , or just the FAQs . Then consider, again for just a moment, that the dissenter BlasterBates considers relevant an article about a study written by someone who quite obviously had not read the study.

And feel free to draw your own conclusions.